| Business contract dispute of damages in debt is crucial in practice,of which the interests of the available damage compensation is an important part of the contract damages,but the law did not in the interests of the available determination,calculation and proof of the detailed rules,just do some principled regulations,the operability is not strong in the judicial practice,and in the judicial practice in the interests of the compensation will be not the case.Aiming at the problem that the interests of the research can be identified,evidence of calculation and is of great significance,it can be tried to buying and selling contract dispute in the interests of determination,calculation and prove a brief analysis and explanation,hope that through the analysis of this article,the judicial practice and determination of the interests of the available,evidence of calculation and has some help.This article is divided into three parts,each part of the point,is introduced based on a case by case analysis,induces the disputed points,then the focal point is theoretical analysis,finally concluded that to achieve the purpose to solve the problem of case dispute.The first part analysis the cement business contract dispute case,the dispute case should focus on whether to pay for it can get benefit,decided to get profit without the problem,for this problem in the first instance and second instance court made the opposite conclusion.Based on this,the author from the definition of interests,the interests of the available types and the interests of the available qualified principles in three aspects,and combining with case analysis,finally it is concluded that this case can get profit should compensate the conclusion.The second part analysis the seed business contract dispute case,case dispute focal point lies in how to profit loss compensation,can get profit calculation problem,for this problem the author from the general method and the concrete methods of theprospects interest calculation two aspects to carry on the analysis,combined with the case,finally it is concluded that this case can get profit should use subjective calculation method and difference method to calculate the conclusion.The third part analysis a tail sand business contract dispute case,the case in the focus of controversy is the evidence can prove can get interest,can have to prove,the interests of the court in the judgment of first instance and second instance different conclusions on this issue.Aiming at this problem,the author from the interests of the available,evidence of the interests of the available standard of distribution of evidential burden and the interests of the available libertad three aspects carries on the analysis,combined with the case,finally concluded that the evidence not available in this case the interests of the conclusion. |