The Empirical Study On The Investigators To Testify In Court

With the continuous deepening of the reform of the litigation system of "the court of the trial center",the necessity of the investigation of the criminal investigation has been gradually known. The revised criminal procedure law in 2012, the system of criminal procedure was first appeared in the system of criminal procedure law. This is the innovation of China’s criminal procedure legislation and a major breakthrough in the current academic and practical circles of the hot topics of research.Based on 2012 amendments to the "criminal procedural law" as the background, the relevant data to collect research of C City Intermediate People’s Court of three years as the basis, combined with interviews with judges of the court, take the method of empirical analysis, the author firstly through an investigation personnel to appear in court to explain the situation of the typical case of 2014 Guangzhou Maoming Li tianfu case, leads to the theme of the exposition, namely the investigation personnel to appear in court system. After that, the author discusses the present situation of the system of investigating the situation of the criminal procedure law in the "Criminal Procedure Law" in 2012, according to the relevant data and data collected by the author. The investigators to testify in court system at the present stage of the characteristics and problems in two aspects. Firstly, the paper discusses the since the implementation of the new criminal procedure law investigators testify in court system performance characteristics, namely the investigation personnel appear to concentrate in the proof of the evidence collection legitimacy, the types of cases to deliberately harm, drug use, theft, crimes, investigation personnel to appear in court due to the examination of the agency’s application and so on. Then the author discusses the investigators appear rate low, "note" instead of the court and other problems, combined with interviews with judges of the court, focuses on the judicial practice in court procedures in the presence of start-up procedures, applicable to the case, identity, description methods. Finally, draw lessons from the mature experience of foreign relevant investigation personnel to appear in court system, combined with the actual situation of our country, from improving investigator’s appearance rate, standardized procedure in court, improve the relevant supporting measures put forward corresponding suggestions, hope to beneficial to perfect our investigators testify system.