| In recent years,the occurrence of the violent terrorist crime cases become more commonplace nationwide,but it also means that the influence of the violent terrorist crimes impact on social public order and the people’s psychological panic will be more and more serious.So it is the most important task at this stage that we can not wait to strengthen the management of this crime.But because of the causes of this crime is complex,involving many factors,so it is the difficult process to fight against the crime.Based on this,this paper attempts from the perspective of comparative law,focusing on the procuratorial power play a part in civil law countries and common law countries in cases of violent terrorist crimes,and we know that the former’s procuratorial power compared with latter’s procuratorial power invloved wider range,greater authority.After clarifying the legal nature of China’s procuratorial power,at the same time compared with a comparative study.Secondly,to selectively studying other countries allocation of prosecutorial power in the violent terrorist crimes,meanwhile to analyzing the institutional dilemma and the realistic dilemma in the process of againsting the violent terrorist crimes in our country.Know then,because lack of related authority led to that the procuratorial organs is difficult to supervise other state organs.That further led to we can’t be better to against,prevent this kind of crime.The reason for this situation is due to the emergence of China’s laws and regulations is not perfect,the power’s configuration of judicial and procuratorial organs are uneven,and defects in actual operation.so that they can not fully play the supervisory role of procuratorial organs to force against this crime.The above problems at the present stage of our country,I proposed that we should based on the the violent terrorist crime’s specific characteristics to configure the procuratorial power,so as to effectively combat the violent terrorist crimes. |
PDF Full Text Request