Preliminary Study On Humanistic Interpretation Of Lenin's Philosophical Notebooks

Philosophical notebooks were written by Lenin during the study of philosophical writings between 1895 and 1916.One of the most important notes is the "Hegel notes",written by Lenin in 1914-1916.In the outbreak of the First World War,Lenin turned to Hegel study and wrote Hegel's notes.The historical value of Lenin's early philosophical works Materialism and empirical criticism has been exaggerated for the purpose of ideological control under the demands of Stalin' s dogmatism,ignoring Lenin 's theoretical value of Philosophical notebooks in 1914-1915.There are three main lines of study on Lenin's Philo.sophical notebooks the Soviet orthodox Marxists represented by Kednorov,the Western Lenin scholars represented by Korsch and the humanistic interpretation represented by Donna ye vskaya.There are two main lines in China:one is based on the traditional interpretation represented by Huang Nansen,and follows the research model of the orthodox tectonic system of the Soviet Union.One is the interpretation model of the tectonicism represented by Zhang Yibing,he thinks there is heterogeneity in Lenin's ideological change.Orthodox Marxism's interpretation of Lenin's Philosophical notebooks has gone through a process form neglected to theoretical system.Kednorov's "planning to establish" clarified the unfinished nature of Lenin,not published for publication,but "drafts for himself';and put forward Lenin's idea of establishing a dialectic system The early study of Leninism in the West focused on Lenin's political party theory,not the philosophical ideas,the emphasis on materialism and empirical criticism,rather than Philosophical notebooks itself.But they are used to attack the orthodox Marxist concept of intuitive weapons,therefore,Philosophical notebooks and materialism and empirical criticism of the opposition has become their traditional ideas.Dunayevskaya and Kevin Anderson,who are the "Western Lenin" home of the few Philosophical notebooks for systematic study of scholars.Attempts to criticize the Philosophical Notes are similar to those of the "Western Lenin" popularities,and they also advocate the opposition of two Lenin,the "former Lenin's Lenin" and "Hegel's Lenin " opposition.They argue that Lenin's reading of Hegel's dialectics in his Philosophical notebooks has undergone a transformation from "materialism" to"idealism".Even the central idea of Lenin's Philosophical notebooks is to restore the truth of idealism and to oppose vulgar materialism.Kevin Anderson further reveals Lenin's transformation from "materialism" to "idealism".They regard Hegel's dialectics as the starting point for Lenin's Philosophical notebooks.They think that the greatest of Hegel's work is that the subject is free and active,so the idea of "free kingdom" is both the core and soul of Hegel's dialectics and the core of Lenin's 1914 Hegelian study.Whether Dunayevskaya and Anderson as the representative of the Lenin Philosophical notebooks of the human interpretation mode,or domestic Huang Nansen as the representative of the "system of structural theory",or Zhang Yibing as the representative of the situation on the interpretation of the model,they all realized Lenin's Philosophical notebooks historical and practical motives,but also recognize when Lenin read Hegel's logic is a process of Ideological Change,and this change to its later guidance of socialist construction The positive guiding significance.We can not deny that the interpretation of the people of Dunayevskaya and Anderson as the representative of the study for our study of Lenin Philosophical notebooks provides a new perspective.In particular,they are concerned about our neglected to Philosophical notebooks on the subject The emphasis on activism,the combination of Hegelian dialectics and Marxist humanitarianism,sublimated the sublimation of Marxist humanitarianism.And this emphasis on the subjectivity is precisely for the victory of the Russian October Revolution,provide guiding significance.However,while we can see the value of learning paradigm,we must correctly understand that there are some limitations in this interpretation mode,including excessive exaggeration of the main role of the only theory,as well as Lenin on the black one-sided interpretation of the Inheritance of Hegel 's thoughts.Therefore,today in re-interpretation of Philosophical notebooks,especially how to understand the interpretation of human learning model,it has great value.