| The difference between ancient politics and modern politics based on conversation of political virtue, which means that modern politics is preferable for the effectiveness of governance. There were this thesis in the time of the ancient Greek Plato. During the brutal political reality for the erosion of the political virtue, Plato give up the rule of virtue and turn to the rule of law with named by the Subprime constitution of which selection show the maturity of law. In this way, law not belong to Philosopher King’s theory of human nature avoid violence and dictatorship, giving the highest position to neutral and objection. In the real political life,the England corporative sovereignty coincided with the division of three types of regimes。With method of transfer from rule of law,England has become the spokesman of Plato in the contemporary timeIn the first part, with help of concept between sovereignty as well as law, the relationship is treated as sovereignty in law. On the second place, symbiosis with constitution of law’s growth is visible for the center of the king court, resolving Unified feudal king power in the 13 century. In the third part,we need to interpret the profession on the judge and barrister.As consequence, clues to the structure of this article is started by multiple interpretations of the law of England, which is considered with the history of England law and rule of law. From the evolution of law itself, it is important that common law became from the institution to intellectual thought. So the intrinsic motivation of independent development is the evolution about absolute spirit of law, while the basement is the customs and habits of the community. Last but not the least, this article is concluded with origination about England nation brought by attitude towards social sciences of the human. |
