Purpose.Breast cancer patients with pathological complete remission(pCR)to neoadjuvant chemotherapy have significantly better prognoses than those without pCR.This meta-analysis examines the accuracy of contrastenhanced magnetic resonance imaging(CE-MRI)and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging(DW-MRI)in detecting the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy,and compares CE-MRI with ultrasound,mammography,and positron emission tomography-computed tomography(PET/CT).Methods.Medical subject heading terms and relative key words were searched for to generate a compilation of eligible studies.The pooled sensitivity,specificity,diagnostic odds ratio,area under summary receiver operating characteristic curve(AUC)and Youden index(* index)values were carried out using Stata 13.0 and Meta-DiSc to estimate the diagnostic efficacy of CE-MRI,DW-MRI,ultrasound,mammography and PET/CT.Results.54 studies of CE-MRI and 8 studies of DW-MRI were included.The overall AUC values for CE-MRI and DW-MRI were 0.88 and 0.92,and the * index values were 0.80 and 0.85,respectively.According to summary receiver operating characteristic curves,CE-MRI had a higher AUC value and * index than ultrasound and mammography but had similar values as DW-MRI and PET/CT.CE-MRI accurately assessed the pathological complete remission in specificity,while PET/CT or DW-MRI accurately assessed pathological complete remission in sensitivity.Conclusion.This meta-analysis indicates that CE-MRI has high specificity while DW-MRI has high sensitivity in predicting pathological complete remission after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.CE-MRI is more accurate than ultrasound or mammography.Additionally,PET/CT is valuable for predicting pathological complete remission.CE-MRI combined with PET/CT or DW-MRI may allow for a more precise assessment of pathological complete remission. |