| Objective: The purpose of this study is to compare the characteristics and differences of soft tissue in class ?,class ? class ?,class ? class ?,and class ? different vertical bone surface types,and to establish the characteristic parameters of soft tissue morphological features of different vertical odontoid circumference.To analyze the difference of soft tissue morphology between different sex and different vertical facial areas,to evaluate the effect of gender and vertical bone surface on the soft tissue morphological features of the oral cavity,and to analyze the relationship between the soft tissue morphology and the craniomaxillofacial morphology,The basis of the correlation between the measured indexes of the soft tissue morphology,So as to provide an important reference for orthodontic and aesthetic repair clinical development of reasonable and feasible program plan for orthodontic clinical diagnosis,aesthetic repair treatment to provide some reference.Methods: A total of 180 patients with orthodontics from Jiamusi university,A total of 180 patients with orthodontics from the Fourth Military Medical University were selected as the subjects.Class ? classification,class ? classification of different vertical bone type adult(male and female half)of the skull positioning lateral radiographs were measured and compared,compared with the soft tissue of the mouth.The statistical results were analyzed by statistical software.The t-test was used to analyze the difference of soft tissue morphology between different sexes in each kind of vertical bone surface samples.The single-factor analysis of variance was used to analyze the relationship between the soft tissue The correlation between the soft tissue morphology of the oral cavity and the correlation between the different vertical bone surface types and the measurement of the soft tissue morphology of the oral cavity was further studied by correlation analysis.Results: Class ? withvarious vertical patterns: There were significant differences in the thickness of the lower lip,the length of the lower lip,the length of the lower lip and the horizontal thickness of the chin.The lower lip group-H line low angle group was significantly smaller than the high angle group(0.4±1.2mm,2.8±1.6mm)P<0.05,While the lower lip length of the low angle group was also significantly smaller than the high angle group(15.2±1.7mm,19.3±2.3mm)P<0.05,The horizontal thickness of the chin was higher than that of the high angle group(14.1±2.3mm,11.8±2.3mm)P<0.05?Most of the gender comparisons between the survey items showed that men were greater than women,?n addition to high angle outside,Especially the horizontal thickness of the chin,low angle(14.6±2.3mm,11.1±1.2mm)P<0.05,normal angle(14.5±3.1mm,11.8±2.6mm)P<0.05 ? Upper lip high angle(13.8±1.6mm,10.7±1.4mm)P<0.05,low angle(14.8±2.1mm,10.2±1.3mm)P<0.05,normal angle(14.7±2.6mm,11.3±2.1mm)P<0.05,Was Statistically significantClass ? Division ? withvarious vertical patterns: Lower lip base thickness,lower lip protrusion-H line,lower lip length there is a significant difference between groups.Low angle group lower lip(16.3±1.8mm,19.7±3.1mm)P<0.05,Lip base thickness,lower lip protrusion-H line,lower lip length there is a significant difference between groups.The thickness of the lower lip of the low angle group was significantly lower than that of the high angle group(16.3 ± 1.8mm,19.7 ± 3.1mm)P <0.05,Lower lip protrusion-H line is also significantly smaller than the high angle group(0.3±1.1mm,2.9±1.5mm)P<0.05,The length of the lower lip of the low angle group was significantly smaller than that of the angle group and the high angle group(15.4±1.9mm,18.7±2.3mm,19.2±2.6mm)P<0.05,Most of the gender comparisons between the survey items showed that men were greater than women,Especially the upper lip base thickness low angle(16.3±1.4mm,13.1±1.7mm)P<0.05,normal angle(15.9±2.1mm,13.2±1.9mm)P<0.05,high angle(16.6±1.8mm,13.3±1.6mm)P<0.05.Upper lip low angle(14.6±2.1mm,11.2±1.4mm)P<0.05?normal angle(13.8±1.7mm,11.4±2.2mm)P<0.05,high angle(13.3±1.9mm,10.9±1.5mm)P<0.05.Lower lip thickness low angle(19.1±1.7mm,15.4±2.0mm)P<0.05,normal angle(18.3±1.8mm,15.7±2.3mm)P<0.05,high angle(17.7±2.1mm,16.5±1.6mm)P<0.05.Was Statistically significantClass ? Division ? with various vertical patterns: Lower lip base thickness,lower lip protrusion-H line,upper lip length there are significant differences between groups.The thickness of the lower lip was significantly lower than that of the high angle group(16.4±1.9mm,19.8±3.5mm)P<0.05.The lower lip group-H line low angle group was significantly smaller than the high angle group(0.2±1.5mm,2.9±1.6mm)P<0.05.The length of the upper lip was also significantly higher than that of the angle group and the high angle group(28.3±2.9mm,25.5±3.4mm,25.1±2.5mm)P<0.05.Most of the gender comparisons between the survey items showed that men were greater than women.Especially the upper lip base thickness low angle(15.3±1.4mm,12.1±1.7mm)P<0.05,normal angle(15.9±2.0mm,13.2±1.8mm)P<0.05,high angle(16.5±1.8mm,13.3±1.7mm)P<0.05,Upper lip low angle(14.3±2.1mm,11.2±1.4mm)P<0.05,normal angle(13.7±1.7mm,11.5±2.3mm)P<0.05,high angle(13.2±1.9mm,10.8±1.5mm)P<0.05.Lower lip thickness low angle(18.2±1.5mm,14.4±2.1mm)P<0.05,normal angle(18.5±1.4mm,15.6±2.1mm)P<0.05,high angle(17.5±2.1mm,14.4±1.5mm)P<0.05.Was Statistically significant.Class ? with various vertical patterns: Upper lip base thickness,upper lip protrusion-H line,upper lip length there was a significant difference between groups.The thickness of the base of the upper lip was significantly lower than that of the high angle group(15.4±2.5mm,18.8±2.1mm)P<0.05,Upper limb protrusion-H line low angle group was significantly smaller than high angle group(0.4±1.2mm,3.8±1.4mm)P<0.05,The low length of the upper lip group was also significantly smaller than the angle group and the high angle group(24.4±2.4mm,28.1±3.2mm,28.5±2.3mm)P<0.05,The horizontal thickness of the chin is greater than the high angle(14.4±2.3mm,11.3±2.4mm)P<0.05?Most of the gender comparisons between the survey items showed that men were greater than women.Especially the lower lip base thickness low angle(18.6±1.6mm,15.7±2.1mm)P<0.05,normal angle(19.3±2.8mm,16.1±2.2mm)P<0.05,high angle(20.3±2.7mm,16.6±2.6mm)P<0.05,Upper lip low angle(14.8±2.2mm,11.3±1.6mm)P<0.05,normal angle(14.8±1.5mm,12.4±2.1mm)P<0.05,high angle(13.3±1.7mm,10.6±1.3mm)P<0.05.Was Statistically significantConclusions: ?n this study,through the comparison of the ? class,? class ? class ? classification,? classification,? class of different vertical facial types in perioral soft tissues were found difference,low,and high angle group on the basal part of the lower lip thickness,and there exist obvious differences in the length of the lower lip and so on,which is the body of abnormal jaw physiological compensation.As orthodontic and rehabilitation physicians,they should be aware of and pay attention to this difference in diagnosis,analysis and treatment,and establish more harmonious and beautiful faces for the patients. |
PDF Full Text Request