Font Size: a A A

Preliminary Outcome Of Intensitymodulated Radiotherapy For Locally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: A Prospective Multi-center Study

Posted on:2018-09-20Degree:MasterType:Thesis
Country:ChinaCandidate:J C LuFull Text:PDF
GTID:2334330518451291Subject:Oncology
Abstract/Summary:PDF Full Text Request
Objective: To evaluate the efficacy,toxicity and prognostic of intensity-modulated radiotherapy(IMRT)for locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma(NPC)from different cancer centers,and try to explore the best chemotherapy modality.Methods: From 4 cancer centers in China including 167 patients from Aug.2012 to Jan.2014,Clinical stage of all of the patient were III-IVb period(seventh edition of AJCC staging)and received radical IMRT combined with concurrent chemotherapy following Neoadjuvant chemotherapy or not.They all received 2-3 cycles of cisplatin-based chemotherapy plus concurrent intensity-modulated radiotherapy(CCRT).Cisplatin-based chemotheapy also were used in both neoadjuvant chemotherapy(NACT)and non neoadjuvant chemotherapy.The prescribed radiation dose was GTV-T D95 66-74Gy(2.1-2.3Gy/f),GTV-N D95 60-70Gy(2.0-2.2 Gy/f),CTV-1 D95 60-66Gy(1.8-2.0 Gy/f),CTV-2 D95 54-60Gy(1.8-2.0 Gy/f),CTV-ln D95 50-55Gy(1.8-2.0 Gy/f),5times/week.χ2 analysis,Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression model were used for prognostic analysis.We set statistical significance with P<0.05.Results: The follow up rates was 96.4%,the median follow-up time was39.5 months.The 1-,2-and 3-year overall survival rate(OS)were 95.3%,90.0%,83.2%,respectively;loco-regional relapse-free survival rate(LRFS)were96.4%,94.0%,92.2%,respectively;distant metastasis-free survival rate(DMFS)were95.8%,89.2%,85.0%,respectively;progression-free survival rate(PFS)were90.4%,79.6%,71.3%,respectively.In 167 patients CR:160 case,PR: 4 cases,SD: 2 cases and PD: 1 cases.Remission rate of all patients(RR)=98.2%(164/167).The 3-year OS,LRFS,DMFS and PFS were 85.4% and80.3%(P=0.383),94.8% and 87.3%(P=0.082),90.6% and 77.5%(P=0.006),76.0% and 64.8%(P=0.104)between two groups,respectively;there were no statistically significant difference except for DMFS(P=0.006).100%(96/96)for receipt NACT group and 95.8%(68/71)for non NACT group,without a statistically significant difference between two groups(P=0.149).Multivariate prognostic analyses revealed that N stage and Clinical stage were independent risk factors for overall survival(HR,15.112;95%CI,2.059-110.901[P=0.008])and(HR,2.748;95%CI,1.232-6.129[P=0.014]);N stage,etropharyngeal lymph node were independent risk factors for progression-free survival(HR,7.457;95%CI,2.635-21.098[P<0.001])and(HR,2.465,95%CI,1.328-4.575[P=0.004]);T Stage were significant independent risk factors for local recurrence-free survival rate(HR,11.010;95%CI,1.418-85.479[P=0.022]);N stage,Clinical stage,etropharyngeal lymph node and neoadjuvant chemotherapy were independent risk factors for distant metastasis-free rate(HR,16.947;95%CI,2.244-128.367[P=0.006]),(HR,2.620,95%CI,1.136-6.045[P=0.024]),(HR,4.758;95%CI,1.971-11.489[P=0.001])and(HR,0.175;95%CI,0.073-0.421[P<0.001]).The incidence rates of mucositis of grade 3 was41.3%(69/167).There was a lower incidence rates of mucositis of grade 3 by using Chinese Medicine(χ2=3.91,P=0.048).Patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy had significantly sever bone marrow suppression(P=0.044).There were no significant differences in the incidence rates of mucositis and xerostomia between two groups(P=0.556,P=0.684).No grade 3-4 toxicities were ovserved in the late toxicities and all of the toxicities were be well controlled and tolerable.Conclusions: 1.Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by chemoradiotherapy may improve DMFS in the patients that with locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma.However,a subgroup analysis should be further studied;2.Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by chemoradiotherapy only increased a slight bone marrow suppression when compared with concurrent chemoradiotherapy and all of the toxicities were be well controlled and tolerable;3.Dialectical treatment of traditional Chinese medicine was effective in reducing acute oral mucositis caused by concurrent chemoradiotherapy inadvanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma;4.Multivariate analyses revealed that N stage and Clinical stage were independent risk factors for overall survival;N stage,Clinical stage,retropharyngeal lymph node and neoadjuvant chemotherapy were significant independent risk factors for distant metastasis-free rate;T stage was independent risk factors for local recurrence-free survival rate;N stage and retropharyngeal lymph node were independent risk factors for progression-free survival.
Keywords/Search Tags:advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma, intensity-modulated radiotherapy, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, concurrent chemoradiotherapy, prognosis
PDF Full Text Request
Related items
A Multicenter Prospective,Randomized Study Of Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy For Locally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Combined With Different Chemotherapy Regimens
Compare The Long-term Efficacy Of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Plus Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy And Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy Alone For Locoregionally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
Comparison Of The Clinical Efficacy Of Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy With Or Without Adjuvant Chemotherapy Versus Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy Alone For Treating Stage â…¡ Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
Discussion On The Comprehensive Treatment Mode Of Locally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
Series Of Research About The Integrated Mode Of Chemoradiotherapy For Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma And The Salvage Treatment For The Recurrent Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma In Era Of Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy
Release Of The Integrated Treatment Of Locally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Multi-center, Open, Randomized, Controlled Study
Induction Chemotherapy Plus Intensity-modulated Radiotherapy Versus Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy In Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
Advances In Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy Of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
Experience Of Weekly Cisplatin Concurrent With Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy For Locally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Patients With Resistance To Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy
10 Comparative Analysis Of Induction Chemotherapy Plus Imrt Versus Induction-concurrent Chemoradiotherapy For Locally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma