Comparison Of The Clinical Outcomeretrograde Peroneal Artery Perforators And Retrograde Posterior Tibial Artery Fascia Pedicle Flap Perforators Fascia Pedicle Flap

Objective To analysisthe Evaluation of retrograde peroneal artery perforators and retrograde posterior tibial artery fascia pedicle flap perforators fascia pedicle flap for the repair period of the leg and foot skin defect effect and complications.Methods In January 2010 to January 2015 in our hospital use of peroneal artery perforators and retrograde posterior tibial artery fascia pedicle flap perforators fascia pedicle skin flap to repair the leg and foot skin defect of patients were retrospectively analyzed,the statistical analysis of flap survival and necrosis rate.The function of the skin flap and complications.Results Peroneal artery group issue of survival rate(84.6%)than the posterior tibial artery group(57.69%),the difference was significant(P<0.05),a group of peroneal artery flap function index(pain,activity limitation,wearing shoes,functional recovery satisfaction)score and posterior tibial artery group was no significant difference(P>0.05).Peroneal artery group of hyperplastic scar,itching,pigmentation,skin graft,numbness,skin graft abnormal pain complication rates,respectively(18.46,16.92,21.54,16.92,21.54),group were significantly lower than the posterior tibial artery(46.15,42.31,48.08,42.31,48.08),(hyperplastic scar,itching,pigmentation difference had statistical significance(P<0.05,skin graft,numbness,skin graft area there was no statistically significant difference abnormal pain,P>0.05).Conclusion Retrograde peroneal artery perforators and retrograde posterior tibial artery fascia pedicle flap perforators fascia pedicle flap can effectively repair skin and soft tissure defect,the leg and foot of retrograde peroneal artery perforators fascia pedicle skin flap of the issue of high survival rate,less complications.