Font Size: a A A

The Variation And Controlling Factors Of CO2 Concentration In A Karst Cave

Posted on:2018-12-15Degree:MasterType:Thesis
Country:ChinaCandidate:J Q LeiFull Text:PDF
GTID:2310330536473383Subject:Quaternary geology
Abstract/Summary:PDF Full Text Request
The running of the karst dynamic system is accompanied by the migration of carbon,the migration among each phase is accompanied by variation of concentration and isotopic fractionation of carbon species.After the integration of previous research data in Xueyu Cave,build high resolution and high precision monitoring network of atmosphere-soil-cave,from the variation pattern and controlling factors of four cave carbon sources?soil,atmosphere,underground river anddirp water?to analysis the variationand controlling factors of cave CO2 on annual,seasonal,daily and rainy scales.In this study,the monitoring which lasted from October 2014 to February2017,contained automatic monitor of atmospheric CO2 and meteorology,soil CO2,cave air CO2,physico-chemical parameters and pCO2 of groundwater.The DIC concentration and ?13CDIC,DIC concentration and ?13CDIC,ions of groundwater in the river were sampled and titrated once a month from the beginning of July 2015.In order to study the interaction between underground river and cave air CO2,laboratory simulation was carried out in July 2015.The variation patterns of pCO2 and DIC in the underground river were analyzed through comparison with solution which physico-chemical and biological process dominated degassing,respectively.All samples were prepared in duplicate and one set was agitated to simulate mixing in surface waters.In order to study the response of cave CO2 to rainy events,three monitors on November 2014,March 2016,June 2016,different rainfall intensities during different seasons were conducted respectively during the study period,the isotopic samples of soil CO2,cave air CO2,and DIC concentration of drip water,underground river.The study found:?1?Xueyu cave-soil-cave system showed significant seasonal variation,the variations of soil CO2,cave air CO2 and pCO2 of underground river,can be considered as the pattern of springelevation,summer peak,autumn decrease and winter low values.The variation pattern means cave air CO2 may be controlled by soil CO2 and underground river pCO2 on seasonal scale.?2?Through the three monitors of November 2014,March 2016 and June 2016,the results showed that the underground river had different variation patterns to respond different rainfall intensities.The variation of cave CO2 increased at first,then decreased,and varied with the variation of conductivity and flow rate.The statistical analysis of all the rainfall events during the rainy season of 2015 showed that the greater the rainfall intensities were,the larger the amplitudes of cave CO2 were,and the shorter response and equilibrium time reached.The interval between rainfalls and outside temperature also affect the response process.?3?The cave air CO2 of Xueyu Cve will suddenly increase and decrease during season alternations,and the variation ranges can reach 16000 ppm.It is found that the CO2 mutation period has a good correspondence with the abrupt change of outside air temperature.During the rising phase of CO2 mutation in the cave,the pCO2 of the underground river increased firstly,and showed a significant daily increase by turn.The conductivity of underground river increased with the rising of pCO2,while pH decreased,and vice versa.The day when the outside temperature was higher than cave air temperature,underground river pCO2 rise;when the night temperature was lower than the inside temperature,the underground river p CO2 decreased,but the decline is relatively small,so that the cave CO2 cumulated totally.This may be the CO2 which dissolved in the vadose zone and then eroded into underground river,enhancing the degassing of underground river to lead an overall elevation of cave CO2 concentration.During decline stage of the cave mutation,the gas exchange between the cave and atmosphere leads to the rapid decrease of cave CO2.?4?The laboratory simulations showed that during the interation of the underground river and atmosphere,the p CO2 variation ofreactors which biological process dominated weredifferent from the reactors which physical and chemical process dominated.The reactors which dominated by biological process,showed obvious diurnal variations,and the pCO2 equilibrium timings were24h?still water?,24h?agitated water?.However,there was no significant diurnal variation in the reators dominated by the physical chemical degassing,and the equilibrium timings were 68h?still water?,331h?agitated water?.There was no obvious diurnal variation in the interaction between pCO2 of the underground river and cave air CO2,which indicated that physical and chemical degassings were dominant.When the degassing rates during the response of the underground river to ranfall were larger than that of the equilibrium,so the equilibrium time which cave CO2 took was shorter.?5?The isotopic characteristics analysis results of the atmosphere-soil-cave system showed,?13CCO2 values of soil and cave,?13CDIC values of drip water and underground water havesignificant seasonal variation,which were lighter during rainy seasons,heavier during dry seansons.The response processes of rainfall can be divided into rising and falling phases.During the rising stages of November 2014 and June 2016 rainfall monitors,through estimation for the diffusion amount of CO2 from soil into cave and soil ?13CCO2,found that the soil CO2 accounted 91%?November?,96%?June?for cave air CO2 variation,which dominates the cave CO2.
Keywords/Search Tags:Cave CO2, Carbon isotopes, Soil CO2, Underground river degassing
PDF Full Text Request
Related items