The Comparison Study Of Basic Attacking Cooperation Application Effect In CBA 2014-15 Champion And Runner-up Post Season

CBA is the first class basketball association in China. With the development of basketball level, personal competence is no more the key point for winning a game. Team- oriented plays an important role in the development of every basketball team. In the fierce competition among a number of teams, each team is pursuing a serious attacking structure which conforms to the team.This article aims to conduct a comparative analysis in light of collecting research documentation, statistical analysis of videos, Delphi method, taking the Beijing Shougang team and Liaoning Benxi team as subject, which won the champion and runner-up respectively in CBA 2014-15. Through the combination of comparative analysis, and statistical analysis of videos, in the 25 games that they took part, a conclusion can be made as follows:1.Beijing team has utilized screen defense in a total of 185 times. They have managed to do the screen defense and achieved 137 times, scored 237 points and lose 48 times. Liaoning team has utilized screen defense in a total of 166 times. They have managed to do the screen defense and achieved 126 times, scored 220 points and lose 40 times. It can be seen through the analysis abovethat Beijing team succeeds in the number of screen defense but with a lower success rate. Hence, Beijing needs to pay more attention to strengthening practice, avoiding failures in screen defense.2.Beijing team has applied break-and-pass with a total of 158 times. It has managed to do the break-and-passand achieved 117 times, scoring 198 points. It loses 41 times. Liaoning team has utilized break-and-pass in a total of 126 times. It has managed to do the break-and-pass 91 times, scoring 220 points. It loses 35 times. It can be seen through the analysis above that Beijing team succeeds in the number of break and pass with a higher success rate. Hence, Liaoning needs to pay more attention to strengthening the practice of break-and-pass, which results in higher success rate.3.Beijing team has utilized pass-and-go 72 times and Liaoning 66 times. Beijing outnumbers Liaoning team 6 times. Beijing has managed to utilize pass-and-go 58 times, scoring 79 points. Liaoning scores 71 points through pass-and-go with 53 times. Liaoning loses 13 times. It can be seen that they are similar in the scores through pass-and-go as well as in success rates and failure rates, although Beijing outnumbers Liaoning. It implies that both of them have done well in terms of pass-and-go.4.Beijing team utilizes coordination 56 times, with 41 times of successful application and 15 times failures respectively. Liaoning team applies coordination 25 times, with 12 times of successful application and 13 times failures respectively. It can be seen that Beijing outnumbers Liaoning in the number of break and pass with a higher success rate. Hence, Liaoning needs to pay more attention to strengthening the practice of coordination.