A Comparative Study On The Attack Ability Of Chinese And Foreign Outstanding Guards In 2013-2014 Season Of CBA Finals

CBA league is the men’s basketball professional league at the highest level in China. This paper tries to find the gap and disadvantages between Chinese native guard and foreign-aided excellent guards through comparative study of the attack ability of Chinese and foreign outstanding guards in 2013-2014 season of CBA finals so as to provide specific suggestions for cultivation of Chinese basketball guards.The paper studies attack ability of Chinese and foreign outstanding guards in 2013-2014 season of CBA finals and, with the use of literature study, expert interview method, mathematical statistics and video observation and other research methods, it provides comprehensive comparative study of the attack ability of Chinese and foreign outstanding guards from various perspectives, such as shot selection, shooting area, selection of attacking area, effective field-goal percentage, true shooting percentage, offensive rebound, capability of drawing fouls and assisting error ratio etc. The main conclusions are given in the following:1. In terms of selection of time of attack, foreign-aided outstanding guards yield a higher percentage of attack accomplishment than native guards under easy and weak defense but Chinese native guards complete more attacks than foreign outstanding guards in haste; when it comes to selection of shooting area, foreign-aided guards shot attempts in zone 1 to zone 14 without evident difference, especially zone 13 and zone 14, the averaging number of attempts is 3.8 and 4.9 respectively, with the field-goal percentage of 56% and 59%, Chinese native guards cannot shot attempts in zone 1 to zone 14, especially in zone 6, 7, 8, 10 and 12, the number of attempts is extremely small; in selection of left, middle and right attacking areas, foreign-aided outstanding guards complete nearly the same number of attacks in the three areas, but Chinese guards fail to do so, especially, they complete significantly fewer attacks in the middle area than in left and right areas.2. Averaging shot distance of foreign-aided outstanding guards in layup area and long-shot area are basically the same and field-goal attempts in near area and middle area but there is a big gap in averaging shot distance in layup area and long-shot area of Chinese native outstanding guards, Chinese native guards vary from foreign-aided guards the most evidently in layup area and lag behind significantly in the number of attacks in layup area than foreign-aided guards; with regards to layup and shooting percentage, foreign-aided guards are generally better than Chinese native guards, for whom, the layup and shooting percentage vary from each a lot and the shooting percentage is significantly higher than layup percentage.3. As regards the field-goal percentage, foreign-aided outstanding guards are better in true averaging shooting percentage and effective field-goal percentage; averaging offensive rebound of foreign-aided outstanding guards is higher than Chinese native guards and it is true of offensive ability to draw fouls; averaging assists of foreign-aided outstanding guards and it is also true of the assisting error ratio of foreign-aided outstanding guards and Chinese native guards.