| From the perspective of pluralism, the article rethinks and reviews the social inclusion problem. Based on the empirical research in the case community, the author reflected and criticized the mainstream domestic views of the social inclusion problem of the immigration, and proposed a view that social integration of migrants is not a social problem, and also argued the default that take the social inclusion of the immigration as a social problem.After the interviews in the case community, the author found that most of the immigration had no idea of join in the city, and they also had little feeling about the exclusion. They all have their own social circle and have nothing to do with the isolation. So the author think that one circle is always far away from another is very normal thing in the modern society. And this will influence nothing about the running and uniting of the society. It is not a social problem.The author thinks that the immigration is a demographic conception more than a sociology conception. So the one who takes it as a sociology conception in his article is not rigorous. Due to the division of refinement nowadays, differentiation of populations and more complex and divers. The immigration have always been divided to several part as the different edge, interest, profession and so on. They are the same as the others in the city, also lack of Interactivity each other. So the author claims that we should take a Interactive pluralism perspective on these issues.At last, the author think that the discrimination and exclusion on immigration are not cultural. It has mainly been caused by the social policy barrier and the underdeveloped society facts. And these couldn’t been taken as the evidence of low social inclusion level. They should be solved with the social Development, but the problem of no integration between groups will still exist. So we should take more cautions on the rights protection and education universal than the inclusion. |
PDF Full Text Request