Research On Reform Of Administrative Litigation System Jurisdiction

Because of Litigation difficult filing, difficult trial, the implementation of difficult situation in the Administrative, judicial authority and public confidence in administrative proceedings are falling down. One of the reason is the administrative area completely overlapping jurisdiction of administrative litigation system. From 2000, our country is under the jurisdiction of system pilot reform, trying to make a better government, ensure the credibility of the judiciary, to make a fair judicial legal environment. Guangdong province has tried to improve trial level, have achieved a proper segregation of jurisdictions and administrative divisions, at the same time expand the jurisdiction of the Court. And have eliminated the grassroots courts are subject to local government in the administrative trial status. Henan province exchanged the jurisdiction from different areas, and becoming a new form of jurisdiction, at the same time, make the effective judicial supervision of administration come true. So the court can overcome the administrative judicial intervention, make judicial back to justice. Zhejiang province have tried to make all of the administrative cases be trialed in the one or two courts, so the judicial resources can be allocated well, the justice scale can be the same one and more justice. In addition, the court which cross Administrative District in Beijing and Shanghai, and the Supreme Court Circuit Court in Shenzhen and Shenyang have recognized by society. But there’re also some problems in Administrative Litigation Jurisdiction System Reform. Improve trial level may lead to contradictory case shift, courts pressure imbalance. Exchanged the jurisdiction from different areas may lead to a new intervention. Make all of the administrative cases be trialed in the one or two courts may lead to some Administrative Chambers of the Court functions disappear. The balance between justice and Easy party litigation. So in the reform, we must deal with these problems, and Guarantee an independent and impartial exercise of judicial jurisdiction.