Research On The System Of Non Litigation Administrative Execution In China

Administrative enforcement in essence is the way to realize the administrative processing, administrative enforcement of non litigation administrative enforcement of China is animportant component of the system, the court based model means that the non litigation administrative cases must have a considerable amount in the judicial practice in our country. The administrative enforcement mode while absorbing foreign experience. But not completely fit the actual situation, in practice, is also facing many problems. The current non lawsuit administrative execution system not only affects the administrative efficiency, increase the burden of the court, but also in the judicial review, cut executive separation has been relatively human rights relief has many shortcomings. To summarize the analysis of these problems, so as to further improvement and development of the non litigation administrative execution system and put forward feasible suggestions is the main idea of this article.The main part of this thesis is divided into four chapters, the main content of each chapter is: the first chapter is the introduction of strong administrative execution mode, a comprehensive introduction to the administrative enforcement mode, which leads to China’s administrative enforcement in the implementation of the court, the administrative organs shall perform as auxiliary ", and then analyzes the advantages and disadvantages of this model. The second chapter introduced our country about the non litigation administrative enforcement regulations; from the main body, the implementation of non litigation scope, four aspects of administrative enforcement procedures and normal relations were introduced. The third chapter analyzes the problems of non litigation administrative enforcement system in our country. The fourth chapter is the focus of this article and put forward feasible suggestions for perfecting the non litigation administrative execution. The main executive power of rational allocation, improve the judicial review, the establishment of cutting hold separation principles and rights of the administrative relative person relief four Issuesto focus on.