Study On Prosecutorial Supervision Of Designated Residence Residential Surveillance

Coercive measures in Criminal proceedings, in order to make the suspect or the defendant to participate in proceedings in accordance with the requirements of the trial, the legal authorities under the provisions of the Criminal Procedure Code to make it temporarily subject to certain constraints of liberty measures. The starting point and the goal is to prevent the suspect or the defendant from avoiding the law,which may disturb or delay the detection activities, prosecute activities and judicial activities,and also to protect the society from been harmed, and to reduce the loss of evidence problem..In addition, the suspect or the accused individual is personal safety considerations for protection against crime.Under the new Code of Criminal Procedure, the people’s procuratorate got the power to supervise the decision and the performance of residential surveillance to ensure the legetimacy of the procedure r.But the public doesn’t trust enough in the supervision carried out by the people’sprocuratorate.There are many problems in practice, for instance,it’s difficult to implement party supervision,, coupled with the progress of the times,the law can not cover a variety of pre-designed special cases,which have made the practice can not fully play their oversight role.March 14 th, 2012, as a new provision,assigned residence under surveillance has greatly enriched the regime concerning compulsory measures of supervision, helped ensure the smooth progress of the criminal procedure. However, since the access to information, legal provisions designed supervision system is not so perfect in the course of criminal proceedings, the prosecution was unable to better supervise, affected the play of assigned residence residential surveillance system utility. I meant to find out the problems in the supervision during the prosecute process, and try my best to put forward some personal views to improve the monitoring mechanism.