Victim’s Commitment In Crimes On Human Organ

In essence, victim’s commitment in crimes on human organ is a commitment that victims make to serious injury. There are two ways to judge the potency of this commitment: One way is to infer from the positive direction, which means to use Theory of Victim’s Commitment to prove that the victim’s commitment in crimes on human organ can’t prevent the behavior from breaking the law, and that it is invalid. The other way is to infer from the reverse direction, which means to judge the potency of the comment according to the content of articles in criminal legislation. If the behavior is regulated as criminal offence, then the victim’s commitment is invalid. Based on this, we firstly classify related articles and extract the circumstances in which the victim’s commitment exists. Then we infer from the reverse direction, and analysis the crimes on human organ which has the victim’s commitment according to the related articles in criminal legislation in our country, and prove that the victim’s commitment is invalid in the circumstances in which the actor’s behavior is regulated as criminal offence. According to this, we generalize some factors the law considers about when it regulates the commitment to be invalid and the conflict about the potency of victim’s commitment in human organ donation and human organ crime. In the last, based on Theory of Victim’s Commitment and the research above, we get the conclusion about the potency of victim’s commitment to injury from the angles of level of injury, age and ability to commit, and if there is any recognition error.