Reserving Or Abolishing Of The Group Licentiousness

1997 of the criminal law listed the group licentiousness alone. Because the group licentiousness is scientific, Few people dare to violate it. However, on May 20th 2010, Jiangsu nanjing qinhuai district people’s court sentenced Ma for the group licentiousness, which is a precedent. This case caused scholars’debate, whereas there is no common opinion in the end. In recent years, reserving or abolishing of the group licentiousness has been the focus of the heated debate for a plenty of social problems. This article analyzes reserving or abolishing of the group licentiousness from the Angle of Punishment law principle、Principle of criminology、the need of traditional culture、the need of social reality. This article’s point of view is to agree with reserving of the group licentiousness. At the first, this paper introduces the origin of the group licentiousness and the arguments scholars’ debate. Secondly, the paper objects to the denial theory of the group licentiousness. Thirdly, the paper objects to the compromise theory of the group licentiousness. Finally, this paper agrees with points of reserving of the group licentiousness.