The System Of Deliberative Democracy With Chinese Characteristics Multi-Storey Building Research

Since the 21 st century, deliberative democracy has been widely accepted in our country, and has been written into the documents of the ruling party repeatedly. To develop the activity of deliberative democracy and intensify institutional innovation under the guidance of deliberative democracy theory has increasingly becoming the most dynamic part of the political restructuring in China. Development of deliberative democracy has become the consensus of officials, scholars and people; The Eighteenth National Congress of the Communist Party of China presents the objective that “promotes deliberative democracy extensive, multilevel and institutionalized development” and The Third Plenary Session of the Eighteenth Central Committee of The Communist Party of China further points out that to “build a deliberative democracy system featuring appropriate procedures and complete segments”. We can say that build a multilevel system of deliberative democracy system has become the development goal of deliberative democracy in contemporary China. Puts forward multilevel building of deliberative democracy system with Chinese characteristics is just a responses which from theory of this goal.Based on the literature analysis, the writer aims to have a whole study and analysis of the deliberative democracy with Chinese characteristics from the perspective of theory, history and reality. First of all, from the western political theory, the politics of the communist party of China, Chinese traditional culture and three aspects analysis the theoretical resources of deliberative democracy with Chinese characteristics, based on this, advances the understanding of the deliberative democracy with Chinese characteristics. The second, according to the order of the development of history, combing the historical development of our party’s practice of deliberative democracy, demonstrates the historical logic and the local characteristics of deliberative democracy in China. In addition, the writer analyzes the overall progressing road of building the deliberative democracy institutional system with Chinese characteristics. Finally, the writer selects some latest case of the current deliberative democracy system innovation in our country; use deliberative democracy theory analyze the case, conclusion case experience about perfect the system of deliberative democracy in our country, summarize specific methods of building deliberative democracy system with Chinese characteristics.Contemporary China’s political system mainly include the organization system of the communist party of China, administrative system, the National People’s Congress system, the People’s political consultative conference system, the system of grass-root democratic autonomy, etc. Based on the existing system resources, the main framework of the system of deliberative democracy with Chinese characteristics consists of five parts, respectively are the deliberative democracy in the form of the CPPCC, the deliberative democracy in the form of the construction of the communist party of China, the deliberative democracy in the form of the National People’s Congress system, the deliberative democracy in the form of the administrative system and the deliberative democracy in the form of the promotion of democracy at the grass-roots level. Among them, the deliberative democracy in the form of the CPPCC is the core, the deliberative democracy in the form of the promotion of democracy at the grass-roots level is the basis. The key lies in perfecting the system of deliberative democracy with Chinese characteristics is that to build the linkage mechanism between the various concrete institutions, forming force for promoting the development of the deliberative democracy system. Concretely speaking it can start from this two following ways, one is that to straighten out the relationship between the deliberative democracy and the existing various systems, make the position for the system of the deliberative democracy becomes clear; the second is to strengthen the development of specific aspects of the deliberative democracy, make the energy of institution innovation which underlying all aspects of the political system into full play.