The Governing Of Transitional Local Public Internet Sentiment

Along with the development of internet recent years, the number of net citizen increases rapidly and the influence of public sentiment on net to the real society becomes more remarkable. Some local public sentiment on net grows into national hot news after being focused and discussed by net citizen, and causes the real world a great impact. This article researches local public sentiment transition and relevant governmental reform.This article studies the internet public sentiment of S City in 2005--2014, figures out the variety of number, realm, emotion and analyses the reason of it through document, data and case analysis. It discusses the reform of authorities, functional department and governmental pattern on local internet public sentiment comparing governmental means and results by using the situation of S City. Meanwhile, it investigates the problems in local internet public sentiment governing and the reasons for them in view of the rise of internet expression and decrease of government credibility, the unbalance of public policy and delay of internet legislation, the obstruction and omission of internet public sentiment governing.The article shows it is objective that the local internet public sentiment appears and it is the result of the rise of internet expression and decrease of government credibility. It is relevant to the unbalanced deployment of local resource and the delay of local governing idea and legislation. Moreover, local internet public sentiment is affected by local social and economic development, macroscopic circumstance and people’s satisfaction to local society. It varies regularly in the matter of number and emotion in different realm.Finally, the article gives some suggestion to local internet public sentiment governing. In the aspect of system and subject, it suggests more governing and less managing, more multiplexes and less singleness, more negativeness and less negativeness. In the matter of method, it proposes more decentralization than centralization, more guidance than control, more government by law than by power. In respect of policy optimization, it advises less rigidity and more variability, less short-term and more long-term decision, less solitary and more cooperation.