Conflict And Coordinate Between Network Public Opinion And Law Application

Democracy and the rule of law has been constantly pursuit and efforts in the direction of the human society, in today’s world information network technology is at an unprecedented rate influencing and changing people’s lifestyle and the way of thinking. The Internet has entered our lives, as a new science and technology information network, to the life of people brought convenient, but at the same time Internet also produced many problem that people cannot be solved by traditional areas, how to network public opinion and relationship between the applicable law is one of them.Network public opinion different from traditional opinion, the network of speech to express itself has anonymity, autonomy, timeliness, transmission speed, wide range of characteristics, provides a new way for the public to participate in social management and the way, so that the public opinion has a new transmission channel. People can more directly of opinions and extensive, and make their voices heard. Internet users can be involved in every corner of the social reality, they through space, weibo, BBS, comments and other ways to express themselves on the Internet stand, viewpoint,especially some focal point question.This way is beneficial to citizens’ exercise of the right to free speech, improve public participate, promote the judicial democracy to realize social justice. But the resulting negative issues also emerge in endlessly, the moral quality of Internet users is uneven, motivation purpose is not the same with the lack of legal concepts, some netizens network management system is not sound, lead to network public opinion in China is not very good play its proper role. Network public opinion and legal conflict between more particularly. Network public opinion hinder justice, increasing the likelihood of errors appear, affect the independence of the judicature, weakening the applicable law. Due to the root cause of the conflict lies in the objective facts and legal facts, law and morality, between civil rights and state power, order and freedom itself is contradictory.Above all, how to solve the conflict between them is around the corner, is an inevitable problem in the rule of law construction. Taking XiaJunfeng, the Yao JiaXin case as an example is put forward the following Suggestions:first, strengthen the supervision of the network, pay attention to the voice of the people from the system design itself; Second, perfecting the relevant laws and regulations, clear responsibility, put an end to the network violence; Third, timely and accurate public official information, put an end to false news; Fourth, improve the quality of the individual citizens, establish the legal idea.