Studies On The Relationship Between Internet Public Opinion And The Judicial Practice

"Know the house leaks in the space, know the government lost in Kusano", the normal operation of judicial activities cannot do without the participation of the public. With the popularization of Internet, people have entered the Internet era, the Internet is playing the other media can not match the role, according to the Internet Network Information Center (CNNIC) report shows, as of 2012 12 at the end, the number of Internet users reached 550000000, Chinese. "The Internet class" quietly rising. The rapid development of the network, provides a platform for the public to express his feelings, the network public opinion has become the main way of Internet users expressed intention. Through the network platform to participate in decision-making, public affairs management has become an important part of our political life, justice is the focus of attention of people. Citizens through the network so that a timely, open and often without the need for a platform to express their views on the case. From a series of cases of Yao’s case, Hangzhou racing case to the case of Li Tianyi, an increasing number of cases has become a hot topic of conversation on the Internet before making a magistrates’ court, the court of public opinion for the court trial brought great pressure, the network public opinion has become involved in the Administration of justice trial rivers potential, irreversible. Network public opinion as a new thing, but with the development of extensive mass foundation is very fast, have brought the great impact to the traditional mode of court trial. In this regard, the court has no clear legal basis can make a direct choice of public opinion on the network, and the relative lack of system of perfect to timely and correct response, if not handled properly the relationship between the two, will make the judgment more difficult. An important means of network public opinion as a citizen’s right to express, is the important component of the social supervision, its impact on the adjudication of the court should be positive, but due to congenital virtual, network public opinion itself free of sense, are easy to be oriented, which in reality has become a double-edged sword. The influence of net opinion of judicial activities has been continuously strengthened, the relationship it is necessary to network public opinion and the judicial activities of the analysis and rational thinking. Effect of himself in the work also deeply feel that the network public opinion brings to the court trial work, and in their daily work have a preliminary understanding. According to the negative influence of network public opinion to the judicial activities, further puts forward the proper countermeasures, in order to achieve a positive interaction between network public opinion and the judicial activities. According to the work experience and study of their own, through the analysis of the characteristics of network public opinion and its positive effect on the trial practice and negative effects, and analyze the causes of its negative impact on the judicial practice, discuss the Countermeasures of public opinion on the network, in order to provide help for the realization of harmonious interaction of network public opinion and the court trial..