Conflict And Balance:Research On The Public’s Right To Know In Investigation Procedure

In a country where advocates democracy and the rule of law, public’s right to know seems to be the premise and foundation of all rights enjoyed by citizens to participate in society life, and it is the essential part of public to exist in this society and to reveal their social value.as a member of this society, people not only have the right to know information relates to their own interests, but also have the right to know events that have happened and are happening,such as the comprehension of investigation procedure in criminal action.The progress of era drives the improving of the people’thoughts, but the public’s right to know in the Trial procedure of the criminal procedure did not meet the requirements of the progress and the public’overall supervision of the criminal procedure.The excessive sealing of investigation procedure and the avoidance of information is not the only way to solve the case. The results of justice is important, but if the public has full right to know the information in the process of criminal program, isn’t it more convincing? As "Zhu Ling case"、"Bo Xi Lai case"、"Nian Bin case", these cases were hot topics in the internet age and become the strong credentials for public to enjoy and fight for the right to know.In the process of constructing the socialist legal system, public’s right to know in investigation procedure is an important embodiment of promoting the openness and the strengthen of the legal supervision. It will also improve the judicial, democracy and efficiency of the litigation. So whether in theory or in practice, the value of public’s right to know can not be ignored. But in the practical operation of judicature, to ensure public’s right to know of investigation procedure we can inevitably impact other protected rights, such as the investigation public principle, the principle of presumption innocence, state secrets, commercial secrets and personal privacy,etc. Practically and theoretically this paper demonstrates the value and conflicts of public’s right to know in investigation procedure, puts forward solutions and perfect measures to the conflict coordination principle, as well as the relief channels and the ways how to realize the maximization value of public’s right to know in the investigation procedure.