| With the development of science and technology, and the increasing sotisfication of economic and cultural construction, the Public judicature also turns its simple type to technological one---Court website, Microblog,Wech and other publicInternet platform, have become a new way for the publics to participate and supervise the process of judiciary on the Internet. Under this background, the system of Disclosure of Judgments on line appears on the scene. It has become an important part of the Public judicature. The disclosure of Judgments on line has many sepecial significances to the transparency of the Public judicatur and Pubilic rights safeguard.On the one hand, this thesis adopts the methology of value to sum up and refine the Disclosure of Judgments on line based on the systematic review about all the laws and regulations since the establishment of People’s Republic of China. At the same time, this thesis will focus on analyzing its innovations. On the other hand, empirical method is adopted so as to prove the space between practical operation and the construction of institution. According to the geographical division of adminsistrative regions, Heilongjiang Province, Tianjin Province, Hunan Province,Guangdong Province, Jiangsu Province, Gansu Province, Yunnan Province were chosen as the objects of investigation by the way of evidence-based analysis. This thesis tries to demonstrate several flaws and insufficiencies of Disclosure of Judgments on line, including the weakness of lagislations, the lack of supporting mechanism, the weaknesses of web design, the insufficient production of jusgments and so on, based on the detailed analysis of the works of Disclosure of Judgments on line in the seven Province, the works of Judicial Opinions of China, the comparisons of undisclosed amount and the overview between2013 and 2014, the quality of Internet public judgment in Hunan Province. It turns out that the equal attention of quality and quantity should be paid to Disclosure of Judgments on line. The obvious fact that we have to face is that the big gap between effectiveness form disclosure of judgments and the great expectations from public. At last, some suggestions and some value determinism to Disclosure of Judgments are given. I look forward to watching and contributing to Public judicatures’ success in a new role. |
