Interpretation Of “Double Critique”

This article is to solve the problem—how is the relationship between critique of the national economics and critique of Hegel’s philosophy,which are two parts as "heterogeneous" in "the manuscripts in Paris ". From the text layout of "the manuscripts in Paris ", when Marx criticize on national economics, he found that Hegel shared common modern metaphysical standpoint with national economists. And through the analysis of the nature of private property, he got materials that can crack the abstract position, which launched an overall criticism of Hegel’s philosophy. The critique shows Marx’s philosophy of “The perceptual activity of new materialism ". The philosophical revolution made Marx reunifying the theory and reality, philosophy and the world after Hegel.At first, this article reveals the separation of the theory and reality, philosophy and the world is the problem domain that young Marx confronts. After the collapse of Hegel’s philosophy, this problem which had perplexed Marx in university came back into his mind again. Marx revealed the inevitable disintegration of Hegel’s philosophy through revelation of Epicurus ego antinomy in his doctoral thesis, and put forward the two-sided of philosophic self-awareness: in view of the world and in view of the philosophy, and thus achieving the philosophilization of the word and the globalization of philosophy, the reunification of theory and reality, philosophy and world. After Marx’s position which has two sides goes through stimulation of material interest in news comment period and understanding of Hegel’s law philosophy of civil society, was embodied to the criticism of the national economics and criticism on Hegel’s philosophy. In "the manuscripts in Paris", national economics consider "business society is always good”, therefor trapped in the operation of private property and neglected human, which results in the contradiction between theory and reality; "abstract labor" of the national economics and Hegel’s "labor" are standing on the position of modern metaphysical, appreciate people in theory, but belittle in fact. Therefore we must criticize Hegel if we want to criticize national economics thoroughly; Marx uncovered the externalization of labor as the source of alienated labor in the discovery of private property, Because of that the private property broke the relations which make the cycle of externalization and possession,then lead externalization to alienation,it makes the integration of Hegel’s labor and labor of national economics, and associated with their human nature and implementation, this provide the basis for solving the common abstract position. Overall criticism of Hegel’s philosophy by Marx is characterized as the sensible and objective, perceptual activity of people, which convert the negative dialectics of Hegel’s spirit to the self-realization of dialectics, the history of Hegel’s rational principles into labor practice of the specific historical principle. characteristic of such philosophy revolution can be given the title of "the new materialism of perceptual practice ", and it is through this philosophy revolution that we must continue to pursue of the historical reality of labor practices, also continue to cling to labor as the core of "economics", through the reconstruction of the "political economy" to show a road which leads to people’s real return.