The Report On Qualities Of Investigation In Canton Province Since2010

The paper makes the investigation over the qualities of the cases censored by the procurators inrecent two years in Canton province in order to further improve the cases’ standards and rule of the police’sinvestigations. It is sampled78cases that are the wrong-produced and negative guilty from the censorshipperspective by the positive survey over the outstanding problems in the police’s investigations that areimproper inquires, the informal evaluation and the examination and the overlooks upon the returning cases.There are following four aspects in these specific cases: one is about the hearsay cases which is shows theaccount for52.56%into the selection check cases about the improper inquires that embodies suchcharacters as the traps, the informal way to require and record, precognition and forced to confess and so on;two is about the evaluation works which is about the account for19.23%into the selection check cases thatare the following ways as the wrong operations, the non-evaluation of key evidences, the mismatched andnon-evaluation of psychosis; three is about the examination and survey which is account for24.36%intothe selection check cases that are our of standard, the laying time, the bad conservation and thecontradictory between the records and proofs.And the paper discovered the reasons regarding with the qualities of these samples through deeplyanalysis and conduction which are the following: one is the insufficient trainings of the investigation for thepolice investigators; two is the great varies about the criminal cases impact a lot the investigations and thelower conciseness about their duties; three is the active skills to find out the proofs with the trials and fouris the misdirection of the ideas about the "more testimony, less proofs and more arrests, less prosecutions".By the analysis above, the author puts forward the such suggestions and measures to improve theinvestigation: one is to encourage the scientific methods into investigations; two is to enhance the levels ofthe professional trainings and the conciseness about the proofs, the due procedures and the duties; three isto put the strict principles of the synchronous records and the system of the retaining and requiring; four isto perfect the mechanism of the outlaws in proofs and the punishments; five is to construct the system ofthe insider checks; six is the collaboration with the police, the procurators and the courts. In the end, theauthor looks forward to release the constructive suggestions by the survey to push forward theinvestigations in the police offices and to improve the quality of such cases.