In the judicial practices, the causal relationship is the essential topic which is often discussed by the personnel who handles the cases. In a single causal chain, endangering behavior leads to harmful consequences. The relationship between the two is simple and clear which does not need too much discussion. However, in the practices of handling cases, as to the case of one case to one result, there are many cases that exert impacts on the trend of the case by some kind of intervening factors. This will cause disputes more easily. Therefore, in the case of non single causal relation, how to get accurate judgment by penetrating the complex case and also imputing objectively is more important. To study on the penal law causal relationship under the intervening factors, to have a correct judgment on the impact from the causal relationship to the punishment fits the crime, give maximum play of the functions of penalty so as to realize real justice. This is the significance of studying this issue. To the basic personnel of handling cases, for the perspective of settling the real issues of case handling, to take the example of real cases or typical cases in the handling of cases, to develop summarization and research and exploration to the causal relationship under the impacts of intervening factors. This has certain significance to the practical operation and also the double values of academic research and practices exploration.In this paper, the author takes Chen’s intentional injury case as example. Through analyzing on the focus of case disputes, it discusses the causal relationship of penal law under the factors of intervening. It makes a summarization of the judgment standards of causal relationship under the intervening factors. Through the trial of the focus issue of case focus, it tries to provide analyzing solution for applicable for the similar cases. This paper is expounded in three parts. The first part gives a basic case and disputing focus briefly which points out the judgment of causal relationship with the intervening factors is a complex issue; the second part is combining with the case of this paper and makes a discussion of the concept, features, situation and imputation under the factor of intervening. It excludes the situations of the penal casual relationship under the factors of intervening. It makes focus discussion on the causal relationship under the factors of intervening factors; the third part makes a summarization of the judgment standards under the intervening factors and also applies the standards in the case discussed so as to reach the purpose of solving the focus of disputes. |