Gramsci’s Revolution Strategy Research

Gramsci (Gramsci, Antonio1891-1937), the founder of the Communist Party of Italy, is one of the founders of Western Marxism. His has made an indelible contribution to Western Marxism, especially his strategic thought for the proletarian revolution. The thought provides a revolutionary new model, and also has the reference value for China’s socialist construction.Gramsci’s revolutionary strategic thought is informed from the victory of the Russian October Revolution and the failure of the proletarian revolution in Western Europe, as well as the discrimination from Lenin’s thought. This paper analysis, the strategic thought of Gramsci’s revolutionary content from positional warfare, civil society and cultural leadership three areas."Positional warfare" is different from "warfare", which is the use of non-violin for long-term, complex struggle, but Gramsci did not give up "warfare", which is a kind of quick revolutionary fight when revolution will be successful;" Positional warfare," the characteristics of the decision in the civil society to be a long, complex ideological infiltration which seeks broad public recognition for the legitimacy of the regime. The deeper integration of civil society, the greater the chance of winning the war; cultural leadership needed to win the political parties, intellectuals and the masses of the three aspects of cooperation, are all indispensable. In addition, this article analyses the relationship among the "Positional warfare" and the social, cultural and community leadership.Gramsci’s revolutionary strategic thought not only absorbs from the ideological essence of their predecessors, but also had an indelible impact for generations, both in the civil society and intellectuals. However, his thought, after all, is short of practical experience as well as the creation of prison by the limitations of the times, defects thought inevitable, but this does not decrease the positive impact on China’s civic society construction, we can inheritance of his thought with critical thinking.