Investigation Report On The Aid Situation Of Criminal Victims By The Procuratorial Organ Of Z

Law of Criminal Procedure, which was amended by the National People’s Congress inMarch14,2012and referred to as the2012“Criminal Procedure Law” in this essay, specifiesthe respect and protection of human rights and takes them to an unprecedented height.However, for a long time, domestic scholars are more concerned about how to protect therights of the suspects and the defendants, but don’t pay much attention to the protection of therights of criminal victims. It’s undeniable that effective assistance to the criminal victims is offar-reaching significance, whether from the implementation of justice for the people or theperspective of giving the criminal victims justice. In practice, the procuratorial organs in someplaces made some beneficial explorations and attempts, but there’re some disadvantages inthe specific operation. So it is necessary to improve the relief system for criminal victims onthe basis of finding problems in field research.Besides the preface and conclusion, the text is divided into three parts, a total of morethan20,000words.The first part analyzes the status of criminal victim relief work exercised by theprocuratorial organ of Z. First of all, the author induces the overall situations of criminalvictim relief work carried out by the procuratorial organ of Z, including the situations in2009,2010,2011,2012and2013.He mainly summarizes the annual aid cases, and the proportiondata of the active assistance cases of the procuratorial organ and the victim’s application forlegal aid cases. Then, the author states the situation of criminal victim relief carried out by theprocuratorial organ of Z, which is explained in the following four parts. The first is aboutstatistical categories of salvage cases. In order to analyze the problems and facilitate theauthor to divide the categories of criminal victim rescue cases into pure involving personalcrime, property crime, pure involved both related to personal and property crime, the authorconducts the classified statistics. The second is about rescue cases approaches which includedcash assistance, the minimum life guarantee and applying for disability certificate and otherrescue approaches. The third is about cash assistance standards which are generally low. Thefourth is about the regional differences of assistance, which are big.The second part explores the problems existed in the criminal victim relief work in theprocuratorial organ of Z. The section comes up with these problems mainly based on the research data in the first part. Firstly, the objects of aid cases are too narrow and the reliefscope division is not detailed, affecting the play of the assistance function of the procuratorialorgan and the relief effect. Secondly, the rescue modes are single in which cash assistancepredominates. Other relief measures are absent, leading to bad relief effect. Thirdly, reliefprocedures are not clear, which leads the prolong of the relief time and difficulties toguarantee the fairness. Lastly, the problem is the lack of funds and security assistance.Compared to the massive relief groups, the limited funds is an utterly inadequate measure.The shortage of funds has become the bottleneck of the rescue work.The third part comes up with the suggestions of improving relief system for criminalvictims by procuratorial organs. This part proposes some recommendations for improvementin the basis of found problems in the second part. Firstly, establish rescue principles anddefine the scope of relief scientifically, such as the principle of timely rescue, reasonablecompensation principle, fair principle and so on. All these should become the basic principleof criminal victim relief by procuratorial organs. The scope of relief should also cover otherpeople in need in addition to the victims. Secondly, expand the rescue modes, launchdiversified relief and improve the prosecution procedure of criminal victim assistance. First ofall, make clear the condition of criminal victim assistance. Next, change the way of criminalvictim relief which bases on a single fund assistance. Thirdly, perfect relief procedure andensure the relief timely and effective. Perfect the process of criminal victim assistance byprocuratorial organs and make the design of the process scientific and reasonable. Fourthly,set up special funds and guarantee the sources of the funds. Fully guarantee the fundingsources of criminal victim assistance by procuratorial organs, making the bailout fundsguaranteed.