Perfection Of The Expert Assistant System

With the rapid development of society, Especially the advances in science andtechnology, More and more civil legal disputes require different expertise, To solve theseproblems for the case to professional has very important significance. Judges who lackexpertise in dealing with these cases often directly adoption agency issued identificationprofessional opinion facts, Trial cross-examination of expert opinion is often a mere formality,Lack of investigation and discussion on professional issues, Affect the fair trial of the case,Litigation is not conducive to the realization of justice.2013revised Code of Civil Procedureestablishes the Expert Assistant System, The establishment of the system in order to betterdeal with these highly specialized cases provides a new way of thinking. But because of thelegislation for the system is too simple, No provision of comprehensive, systematic, to operatewith the concrete practice of the various problems and instability. In order to make the systembetter was carried out, to play its positive role, it is necessary on how to further improveChina’s Expert Assistant System-depth and detailed analysis. In this paper, a total of about26,000words, roughly divided into the following five sections:The first part is to introduce the practice of involving experts who assist judicial systemand lead to practical problems, As an application of the monograph, In this paper, two NewPeople v. District Court, after the implementation of the first attempts to assist the expert’scase is instructive guide the core topic of this article, That is for the experts who assistedsystem because the law is too simple, relevant programming is not clear, making it chaos injudicial practice, their own ways. It is necessary to improve our experts on how to assistpeople to analyze the system in order to enable it to better get used in judicial practice, thereshould be legislation to achieve its effect.The second part is the Expert Assistant System overview, Describes the practicalbackground of Expert Assistant System generated, basic concepts, as well as its comparisonwith the similar concept (expert witnesses).The third part, combined with the status quo legislative experts who assisted in our system and the use of judicial practice, analyzes the problems that exist in the system.The fourth part of the extraterritorial related systems for the interpretation and evaluation,Including expert witnesses in litigation system and the civil law countries who assisted theJapanese system of common law, Our experts emphasize not an expert witness and assistpeople prefer litigation assistant, of course, these systems offer a more or less have to learnfrom our experts assist people to improve the system.The fifth part, combined with the foregoing analysis, the author on how to improve thesystem expert who carried out a number of auxiliary envisaged litigation involving the statusof experts assisted person’s qualification, the Senate complaint procedures, rights andobligations of the views collected letters.