| Microblog, as realization of the rights of citizens to freedom of speech, a new free media, has become an important expression of People’s daily life and indispensable source of information. While also promoting the advancement of democracy, social and cultural prosperity, individuality plays an irreplaceable role. At the same time, in recent years a number of other public and private rights violations through the microblog have emerged,which exposed the legal issues are endless. From the year 2010 about "Kingsoft" and "360"microblog first case, to "Qin huo huo"case, "Li two split four"case, and so on micro-blog hype, then to 2011 Guo Mei Mei microblog ruined "Red Cross",and “network big ballad "Zhou Lu Po’s frenzied, a series of " micro-blog Memorabilia " gave us a serious warning about Legalized Management on microblog freedom of speech. On the one hand, people seem to realize that freedom of microblog expression has exceeded its proper limits,looking the microblog expression as a scourge, anxious to ban eradicated. On the other hand, the extensive management of microblog expression was very easy to damage the realization of the right to freedom of speech. And then a series of restrictive measures followed. The anomie of Microblog expression was just representation, but the deep-seated problems was the anomie of Legalized Management. How to correctly guide the behavior of microblog expression by all means of legal, moral and administrative achieved positive development in the framework of the rule of law; how to become a platform for the effective realization of the rights of citizens to freedom of speech; how to not become spread rumors, abusive "Pandora Box ", it is worth considering. This paper attempts to compare the relevant principles of jurisprudence, the actual cases and related national legal systems, summed up the rule of law about management path in line with China’s actual situation on microblog freedom of speech, to solve some of the currently facing problems. |
PDF Full Text Request