| The aim of the reconciliation process is to resolve disputes between the partiesand fully to protect the legitimate rights and interests of the parties. The punishmentconforms to the new times. But it subjects to the Chinese traditional culture and theinfluence of the common law governance at the grass-roots level of soil disturbance,and the new criminal procedure law and relevant judicial explanation for thesettlement of the provisions of the public prosecution procedure is not enough. It leadsto the operation of judicial organs is not same, thus it could jeopardize the bottom lineof justice.So, according to the judicial practice, the settlement law in the case of publicprosecution in our current points is not clear, and there are a lot of defects and theinsufficiency. I have a lot of suggestions to consummate the public prosecutionsettlement measures thronging the analysis of the scope of the criminal reconciliationand supervision mechanism. There are introduction, body and conclusion.With the problem of criminal reconciliation in the judicial practice, there arethree parts in the paper. The first part mainly introduces the concept of criminalreconciliation and the development of criminal reconciliation at abroad. The secondpart is talking about the relevant provisions of the public prosecution procedure,which are analyzed in detail and are pointed out the existing problems in the case ofpublic prosecution. The last part, According to the problem, I will come to my ownideas. |
