The Comparative Study On The Diplomatic Thought To America Between Mao Zedong And Deng Xiaoping

Sino-US relationship is one of the most important contemporaryinternational relations, not only because the United States is the world’sonly superpower, but also because many of China’s problems, such as theTaiwan issue, the Diaoyu Islands issue and others have U.S. forces there.Chinese Taiwan issue, such as the Diaoyu Islands issue.Mao Zedong as the core to achieve the first generation of collectiveleadership, from the founding of the conflict, the United States ofUS-China relations after the fight for the normalization of the relationshipof American20-year-old foundation of New China out the key to a newstage of development to gradually put the thought diplomatic. To open thefoundation Deng to reform since China deepen cooperation to create aCentral America in turn, to create a favorable international environment,to achieve the establishment of diplomatic relations. Eastern Europe, theSoviet Union, moved the only superpower in the world multipolarity theUnited States. In this paper, two giants of the deep impact diplomaticthinking comparison of subdivision diplomacy in the United States, andannounced that it was considering the ideology of States.In of Americaand the contents of both the American culture, the struggle of the UnitedStates establishment it has diplomatic relations with, it is done by thecreation of Mao Zedong cooperation, foreign policy military, ideological,America, United States, Deng Xiaoping political and ideological, tocompare the similarities and differences, in Deng Xiaoping later studyand ideas, in the U.S. comparative study of Deng Xiaoping and MaoZedong economy particular, comparing the background thinkingdiplomacy of Mao Zedong. In order to provide a reference theoretical, itis done in the hope and extracted by the comparative study of DengXiaoping diplomacy enlightenment thinking.Official diplomatic relationswith Mao Zedong after the civil society and the founding of the United States, the development of the science of diplomatic strategy of theUnited States In order to encourage the association of public goals andthe United States government, in the standard, you need to meet in orderto work together to perform a full range of diplomatic relationscomplementary. There diplomacy, culture, sports exchange thoughts,Then, during his visit to the local rodeo Deng delivery in the UnitedStates, in the United States, Deng Xiaoping won the cowboy DengXiaoping, the goodwill of the American people carry to see a cowboy haton his head. Americans changed the heart of the country’s image. forChina to join the international community, I shows the attitude of openoutdoors. Attention is paid to training Xiaoping in particular., In order toimprove the living standards of human knowledge, and willing to investin education is not just not study foreign advanced technology andWestern student culture of public school. They grow in large quantities asChina’s reform and opening up. To learn the advanced experience offoreign countries, and promote the development of China’s reform andopening. Americans, long-term friendship with the great momentum ofChina’s only specific people today many are aware more and more,students in the United States, people of America as a cultural ambassadorof China.As major countries in East and West people that it does not existin the world that has changed the way of only two, including thedevelopment of bilateral relations between the exchanges, for thecommon good, the United States and China There is no difference. Thenear future, which will compete in symbiosis, differences of competitionin China and the United States. Potential war broke out between Chinaand the United States is small, but that does not mean the disappearanceof the conflict in the United States and China. Era of peace anddevelopment is bound, in order to survive in the battle and cooperation ofposition between China, which remains subject to the multi-polar world.Deng Xiaoping and great people Mao Zedong, remains an importantpractical significance of diplomatic thinking in the United States.