Research On Public Policy Of Intellectual Property Right In Culture Industry

The cultural industry of China has drawing more and more attention in society as an emerging and vibrant industry. As a new point of Chinese economic growth, the legal protection and policy guidance of the cultural industry is imminent. Today, Chinese current legal system of intellectual property rights and cultural industries policy focus more on the cultural industries, cultural products, intellectual property protection, the improvement of investment and financing policy and the reform of cultural system, which is focused on the cultural industry chain and the back-end maintenance of interests. The most fundamental bottleneck of the development of Chinese cultural industry is the lack of creativity, lack of creativity and innovation of citizens and the society. Today’s intellectual property legal system ignored the creation, use and management of intellectual property creation, which seems to be rather passive. Therefore, it is not conducive to stimulate the creativity of cultural industries. It needs related measures of intellectual property’s public policy to compensate deeply. Meanwhile, Chinese current cultural industries policy system contains not only the policy of intellectual property rights, but also the industrial policy, cultural policy, science and technology policy, taxation and financial policy, the policy of the talent education, investment and financing incentives and foreign trade policy and so on. The level of these policies is low and dispersed. There is the lack of coordination between these various sectional policies. It is hard to form the policy efforts in the further development of cultural industries. Therefore, it is necessary to build the intellectual property rights-oriented public policy system and the collaborative operation mode in the cultural industry of China.This article starts from attempting to talk about the legitimacy of public policy in cultural industry. In the next, it tries to explore how to build the public policy of intellectual property rights through the introduction of the relevant experience of typical countries in this area. This article includes four parts:The first part is " the analysis on legitimacy of public policy system of intellectual property rights in cultural industry". This section discusses the neoclassical and neo-classical concept of intellectual property policy, which laid the theoretical foundation for the establishment of the public policy system. On the basis of analyzing the reality of the development of cultural industry, it points out that the key factor is the lack of creative. Meanwhile, this article points out the special nature of public policy in cultural industry, according to the own characteristics of this industry.The second part is" the introduction of foreign practice of public policy of intellectual property rights in cultural industry". This section introduces the experience of four countries including UK, USA, France and Japan. On the basis of analysis, it concludes useful experience.The third part is "the empirical analysis of public policy of intellectual property rights in cultural industry". This section points out the disadvantage—incomlpete, inactive, discordant of Chinese public policy of intellectual property rights through the enumeration and analysis of policy in this field.The fourth part is" ideas about public policy of intellectual property rights in cultural industry". In this section, it tries to make the initial ideas about how to build the public policy system by objectives, content and implementation path.