| In recent years,Criminal reconciliation has been widely existed in judicial practice,Nomatter the cases in the proceedings or outside the litigation. Criminal reconciliation has beenwidely applied to judicial practice.Criminal reconciliation has become the main measurewhen the judiciary deal with slight criminal cases,But there are not related theory of criminalreconciliation,Even at the time of judicial authority settle criminal reconciliation cases,theyalso combine with the criminal policy of tempering justice with mercy and the basicprinciples of the laws.so we have to solve the problem that how to apply the criminalreconciliation.This paper propose to analyse the current situation of Criminal reconciliationin our country Combined with practical cases,classify the Criminal reconciliation,includingsin reconciliation and publishment reconciliation,the reconciliation in the proceedings oroutside the litigation.And then I study the theoretical basis of its existence,discuss therationality and the legitimacy of the Criminal reconciliation on the basics of the existingcriminal enacted law, the key point of the paper is to put forward a clear limit is the premiseof existence for criminal reconciliation,analysing the reconciliation should be limited in theminor crime reconciliation through the above analysis of the classification of sin,,and putforward the point is to limit felony reconciliation among minors and at least75one full yearof life,Punishment of reconciliation is related to our country criminal law of sentencingsystem.Generally,felony and misdemeanor can be reconciled,the cases solved by themself ofoutside the litigation Can’t get support of law.the reconciliation of private prosecution areCompliance with the law,At the same time the reconciliation outside the litigation should beadmited by judicial authority,he cases in the proceedings are presided over by judicialauthority,The judicial authorities can reconcile cases according to the Specific sentencingplot. |
