Since the Southern Dynasties of Liang’s crown prince named Xiao Tong host to write Wen Xuan(alternate named Chao-ming Wen Xuan)and when the anthology were published, the researching work of Wen Xuan had become a distinguished learning, and thus the analects selected works were born. In order to let more people understand the selection of literary words, the ancients had to make note for it. Among them, the main annotations we known was by Li Shan. Certainly Li Shan’s note for the selection of research work has become part of the the analects selected works, and including the references in Li Shan’s annotations. Though, as early as some scholars were studied the interpreted by Li Shan in citing the “the interpreted of Er Ya â€which was written by Guo Pu, but the statistics situation is different, and also need to be further analysis.So this paper first described the interpreted by Li Shan in citing the “the interpreted of Er Ya â€which was written by Guo Pu, and after detailed study,we got Li Shan had quoted articles are 165(the repeat articles are 33) in Guo Pu’s note on Er Ya.Secondly, compared the citing(coverd the meaning and the phonetic notation) with the “Er Ya Jiao Jianâ€by Zhou Zu Mo and the book of “Guang Yunâ€.After this job,we want to find the similarties and differences between “the note of Er Yaâ€by Li Shan’s quote and the book we see today.Of course, the change of phonetic notation.This article is divided into five chapters are discussed in this paper.Among them, the first chapter is introduction part,mainly to research present situation and the significance of topic selection, research materials and methods,etc,are introduced. The second chapter introduction the situation of Guo Pu’s“the interpreted of Er Ya â€which had cited by Li Shan. The third chapter mainly to introduce the phonetic features on Li Shan’s quoting of Guo’s reference. The fourth chapter analyzed the characteristics of the meaning of that.The fifth chapter is theconclusion part, to summarize that Li Shan’s citing in Guo Pu’s“Er Ya noteâ€whether on phonetic or hermeneutic are both flexible according to the change between Jin and Tang Dynasty.And also not quite different between the book we see today. |