From Production Parading To Communication Paradigm

Habermas has been rebuilt the theory of historical materialism, and his which is known as "reconstruction theory" and produces huge influence. Habermas argues that Marx’s theory of productive paradigm has significant flaws for its interpretation of capitalism does not have a universal character, therefore it can not be any promoted especially for late-capitalist societies, and it is no longer able to make a correct interpretation of social existence. That is, it can not overcome the social conflict and or achieve social integration, which so it requires this to be rebuilt. But his reconstruction theory is essentially rebuilding replacing the Production Paradigm theory of Marx with his theory of Communicative Paradigm. At first, based on the correct interpretation of Habermas’ communication paradigm, this paper attempts to, the paper analyze Habermas critics to for the production paradigm theory of Marx’s whose axis is labor as the axis of criticism, which means that it discusses according to what kind of interpretation principle Habermas achieved replacement of production paradigm according to the interpretation of the principle of and how Habermas dumped on the foundation of Marx’s theory of production paradigm. Then the paper explores the revolutionary and critical nature of Marx’s production paradigm out the light of Habermas’ explain principle so the true face of Marx’s production paradigm theory is unveiled. Finally, on the basis of the correct evaluation of the reconstruction theory of Habermas’ communication paradigm, the paper explains the positive significance of and the difficulties faced by the reconstruction theory.In the preface introduction, the author of the article has been described the reasons causes and significance of the topic, and has been described reviewed the research situation at home and abroad and introduced the present status of current research topics. In the first chapter, we first clarify the origin of Habermas’ communication paradigm, analyze the object and explain Habermas’ criticism of Marx’s reconstruction of historical materialism.The second chapter explains how Habermas turned to the communication paradigm and its analysis and understanding of the historical development and social status, and explains the "prescription" of Habermas’"disease" in the modern society.Against criticism from Habermas and based on Marx’s classic literature and basic position, the second chapter is mainly restated the revolutionary significance of Marxist productive paradigm theory - Max’s view on historical development and social status and the practical ways to complete human liberation; therefore it open unveiled the true face of Marxist theory and pointed out that the rationality of Marx’s philosophical revolution sensibility It has a reasonable place.The main content of the third chapter is about proper evaluation and positioning of the reconstruction theory of Habermas’ communication paradigm. Firstly it gave evidence of defects and difficulties faced by Habermas’ reconstruction theory of communication paradigm have, and proved the advantages of contrary to Marx’s theory of production paradigm on the contrary is superior. The Secondly is the exposition of the positive significance of Habermas’ reconstruction theory of communication paradigm for the development and the innovation of contemporary Marxist theory has.In the conclusion part, it is pointed out that Habermas’ reconstruction theory is the inheritance and supplement of Marx theory.