The Contrastive Study Of Korean Pragmatic Maker Between ’(?)’ And ’(?)(?)’,and Their Corresponding Form In Chinese

Discourse markers is an important part of oral communication. Through the use of discourse markers, speakers can convey the speaker’s intention and attitude more effectively and makes the speech more natural, and help the listener’s to understand the discourse. But the attention of the discourse marker and the official start of the research are from the 1980s. After this, although academia study of discourse markers is rich of discussion, but it’s mainly concentrated in the systematic study and individual language study. The comparative study between similar discourse markers in different language and similar comparative study of discourse markers within the same language are still in its infancy. Among them, the comparison between Korean internal similar discourse markers and the comparative study of discourse markers in Korea and corresponding performance research are relatively less. On discourse markers in the Korean language teaching is less involved. This increases the Korean learners, especially China’s Korean learners in Korean the difficulty in the process of acquisition. Therefore, this article is to the south Korean popular TV series, such as sitcoms for corpus, to compare the function of Korean discourse markers "(?)" and "(?)", And analyzes their corresponding performance in the Chinese language. Specific content as follows.First of all, analyze the function of Korean discourse markers "(?) " and "(?) ", and then, compare and analyze them. This paper will divide the function of "(?) " into "focused, access time, negative attitudes, weakening and strengthening, word correction, list or omit", etc. and the function of "(?)" are "focused, access time, negative attitudes, weakening, reinforcement, trying to confirm", etc. Among them, the function "express negative attitude" of "(?)" and "(?) " is taken a further refine analysis. Replacement method is then used to analysis compares the common function and a function of their own between " (?) " and "(?) ". Among the "(?)" and "(?)", there is the situation that the common function can be completely replaced to use; There is the situation that the function can be only exchanged but the use is changed; There is also the situation that the replacement is impassable. And analyze and explain the situationSecondly, this paper discusses the corresponding performance in Chinese between the discourse markers "(?)" and "(?)". Corresponding to its actual meaning to correspond performance and non performance. And nalyze their corresponding performance in the Chinese language. From the results, there is the situation which can be directly translated, there is also can be translated according to context analysis, and there is the situation which is no corresponding performance, and then analyze these situations.Through the comparative analysis between "(?) " and "(?) ", reveal the actual meaning of "(?) " and "(?) " which is completely different as a discourse marker and find there is a lot in common. There are some situation which can be used to replace. The corresponding performance is also varied in Chinese. There is a certain practical significance in the acquisition of Korean and Korean teaching and textbook development, and the translation of discourse markers between Korean and Chinese.