But Different

If talking about abstract art master, the most representative artists of course non Piet Mondriaan(Pieter Mondrian) and Vasily Kangding(Wassily Kandinsky),the two is.These two artists since twentieth Century is the most typical representative of abstractart, also the pronoun of two different types of abstract art. Mondrian works tend torigorous, rational, geometry style, the extreme simplicity and calm, known as "cold abstract", while Kandinsky’s works tend to intuition, inspiration, decorative, free spiritedand changeable, known as "heat abstraction". Two abstract art form, master of the art of the embryonic form of the art experience, language influence on their artistic creationthat later mature artistic language to establish, this art development process has greatcomparability. This paper as the starting point, explore the two masters of the art effects in different life background and the cultural environment, the development track ofdifferent artistic road and similarities and differences hidden aesthetic taste and artistic language, and was informed that the two of them to the abstract art of understandingand comprehension.Born in twentieth Century, modern art abstract art influence by the trend, and become an independent school in the development of modern art thoughts, has a distinctive andunique artistic personality. Piet Mondrian, and Vasily Kandinsky became the two fully deserve abstract art masters in twentieth Century the most representative, their twolanguage of art and aesthetic characteristics have a style of one’s own, brought abreath of fresh air to the then dull artistic environment, also let the artists and art loversa new visual aesthetic experience. Two artists, art style and art form based on the different art history, two abstract painting is divided into two factions, one faction isgeometric abstraction represented by Mondriaan, the academic community will be defined as "cold abstract", and the other is the lyrical abstraction represented by Kandinsky the academic circles, which is called as "warm abstract". Although it is two kinds of disparate factions and aesthetic, but the two masters of the art in the concept of art experience, artistic methods and determine the artistic language has a similar expression and artistic views. Due to the difference of life trajectory of two people and the living environment, together with two people’s religious belief and pursuit of the aesthetic differences, also makes two artistic style and painting language have obvious differences, which have a distinctive form of art. Two abstract art master for the theoretical study of abstract painting is not tasted, if there is no theory of knowledge asthe deep drawing creation basis, so the two works are not possible in the history of artleft so strong a. Two abstract masters wrote papers, books, essays and so on, are clearly expounded the concept and spirit of abstract art, for later us for learningabstract art left very valuable information, we can more perfect appreciation of abstract art and pointed out the direction, but also laid the abstract art can not be replaced the status of Art in today’s art in the environment.In this thesis, the author mainly aimed at the "harmony but not Sameness" and "sense and sensibility" of materials research. The so-called "and" refers to the same, there are many similarities between the two artists, such as age, are at an early age to study painting, the painting, early commercial painting landscapes, toss and turn restlessly in several areas, the impact of the war and so on. But the most important point is that thesame two people almost at the same time to abandon his previous style of painting,turned into abstract paintings created in the past, have become very influential tomaster the art of abstract art. Is the two and "different" refers to the works, an extremelyrigorous calm, known as the cool abstraction, a wild passion, known as warmabstraction, the meaning of this thesis is to find the reason, what is the impact of the two artists to choose the abstract art as his own artistic style? What are the reasons that make the two masters are so different, and even can be said to be the two extremeabstract forms? From the two artists themselves write scholarly articles, publishedbooks to start, combined with the two works, carefully taste the two artists from the living environment and experience, rethinking some difficulties encountered and change theirart on the road, to find their similarities from this information, find different points hidden in the same point from behind, it can be seen two abstract artists think and choose whatworks in their own language style, is the final "sense and sensibility" different but the same artistic style.Therefore, to this problem to find in the two masters of the art experience and lifetrajectory in the answer, this thesis is the initial purpose.