The Criticism Of Chen Ku-ying’s<Changes Biography>Concept

This paper put forward different views to Mr.Chen Ku-ying thought <Changes Biography> was the book of Taoist. Article discusses in eight areas:First, according to the the beginning of all things, cycle development, following the heaven and the earth, valuing or inhibiting the firm and weak, we found that there are significant differences between <Tuan Biography> and Taoism.Second, even though <Large Xiang> and Taoism do not lack same things, there is no necessary link between them. It said that <Lao Zi> and <Zhuang Zi> had influence in <Xiang Biography> is lack of the factual basis.<Small Xiang>’s explanation on <Book of Changes> have some same things with Taoism, but they are not complete identical.Third, the origin of yin and yang, the relationship between the channel and the implement, the meaning of the moral, the origin of Tai Chi, the attitude to divination, the changes concept and so on in <Copulative> all have differences with <Lao Zi> and <Zhuang Zi>.Fourth, silk book <Copulative> and <Copulative> are controversial on the time,<Copulative> are not continued by Han dynasty scholars.Fifth, there are some same things between <Wen Yan> and <Lao Zi>,<Zhuang Zi><Four Classics Of Huangdi>, but they still have many differences.<Said Gua>’s "channel","moral","reason","nature","life" and <Lao Zi>,<Zhuang Zi>’s idea are different. Many dialectic thoughts in <Lao Zi> and <Xu Gua> have different words but same meaning. Before <Xu Gua>, we already can found these dialectic thoughts in <Changes Biography>. To address the originator of these dialectic thoughts, we should prefer <Book of Changes> to <Lao Zi>.In short, through the comprehensive analyze about <Tuan Biography>,<Xiang Biography>,<Copulative>, silk book <Copulative>,<Wen Yan>,<Said Gua>,<Xu Gua> we found that Mr.Chen Ku-ying thought <Changes Biography> was the book of taoist seems not very secure, so it need to further discuss.