The Control Study Between Korean And Chinese Imperative Sentences

Imperative sentences in both Korean and Chinese languages are very common as one of the basic sentence patterns, based on the commands in Korea as the research object to discuss the relation between the two languages.This article is divided into five parts.The first chapter is the introduction, first elaborated the research purpose, leading research and specific research methods. The second chapter first has been stated the concept of imperative sentence in Korea is always controversial position determination and semantic features, and to the end of the Korean YuWei and Chinese modal particles is expounded respectively, as the basis of the third chapter studies. Imperative sentence in the third chapter tries to study Korean in syntactic aspects corresponding relation, and command a stern expression corresponding word in Korea, specifically about Korean sentence-final and Chinese modal particle. In the fourth chapter through the Korean words behavior were discussed, trying to find out in Korea imperative sentence in the place where the similarities and differences between the pragmatic. Through the study found that imperatives of indirect speech act can be divided into state discoursebehavior and words induced behavior. Behavior as indirect speech act and direct order words, behavior and persuasion statement discourse discourse behavior also puts forward some appropriate conditions, to meet various conditions appropriate to reflect properly the state discourse behavior and words induced behavior. Statement discourse behavior according to the behavior of beneficiaries or divided into the center of the speaker’s words, the listener center word, the sentence features mainly embodied in the words of the listener said of dissatisfaction with the proposition of the speaker’s words. Induced discoursebehavior according to the speaker can be divided into and third party centered at the center of the listener induced behavior, because the words are not for you in the future, so there are no center ofthe speaker’s words to coax discourse behavior. And clear, no matter in Korean or Chinese, imperative sentence forms and the actual pragmatic are inconsistent, in the process of language application should not only from the perspective of grammar correctly or not, should alsoto take into account cultural differences and language environment can we truly achieve the position of clear communication, and this isthe meaning of pragmatic research. Imperative sentence in the fifth chapter the conclusion summarizes the full text for Korea sentence-final and modal particle, syntactic aspects corresponding relation, and points out the next research direction.