Experimental Study Of The Impact Of Interview Preparation And Explicit, Implicit Measurement On Structured Interview Result Validity

As one of the important human resource evaluation methods,structured interviewshas been widely used in the recruitment process of enterprises, institutions, schools andother organizations. Entire structured interview involves the test design, evaluationfactors screen, assessment criteria finalized, time control, interviewer selection, theinterview specific implementation and many other steps, thus the effectiveness ofstructured interview results is also affected by many factors, the interview subject(interviewer), the interview object (interviewee), tools (tests, procedures,environment) and other aspects of the interview would have affected the validity ofstructured interview results.Based on realistic needs, how to improve the effectivenessof structured interview results becomes an important issue in this research field. Thestudy through the simulation of the structured interview way to validate three variables:the response time to prepare, behavior event preparation, the impact of interviewpreparation and explicit, implicit measurement on structured interview result validity,and through the interview result and the contrast between the test criterion to validatethe validity of the structured interview results. This study is roughly divided into thefollowing three aspects:Study1: The impact study of response time to prepare on the effectiveness of thestructured interview results. Response time to prepare is the time that response time to prepare for the interviewee during the interview is the time that the interviewee havestarted to answer the interview questions from received interview between thinkingpreparation time. The results showed that there is no significant difference in responsetime to prepare group and the non-response group preparation time in general, butshowed significant differences in the ability of certain qualities such as strain capacity,have time to prepare group performance is more superior.Study2: The impact study of behavior event preparation on the effectiveness of thestructured interview results. Behavior interview preparation is the behavior of theinterviewees to organize their former behavior events and practices by logical analysisin order to answer effectively during the interview process. This experiment source areclassified according to the behavior to events, which can be divided into their ownbehavior preparedness, preparedness behavior of others, including the behavior ofothers to prepare for the event to sort through the practical experience of others to interview preparation. In this study, a structured interview by simulating the way fortheir own behavior event group, event group behavior of others, no behavioral eventpreparation group control experiments. The results showed that the behavior of othersare ready to try the event, which was significantly higher than the results of theinterview unprepared behavioral events were tested, and ready to have a behavioralevent group and no difference between the groups prepare behavioral events is notsignificant.Study3: Explicit and implicit measuring influence on the effectiveness of thestructured interview results. Explicit measurement refers to the interview questions onlyfor an evaluation of the quality and the evaluation of the quality is easy to judge theinterview assessment methods for interviewee; implicit measurement refers to theinterview questions can measure many quality of assessment and evaluation at the sametime, and the evaluation quality presents multiple correlation. During testing interviewquestions,it is not easy to determine the quality of the evaluation interview evaluationmethods. In this study, a structured interview by simulating the way for explicit andimplicit measuring control experiments. Results show that the validity of the implicitmeasure is significantly better than the explicit measure of the interview results，thereliability was also significantly higher than dominant measurement.