Comparison Of Flexible Ureteroscope Incision Drainage Unite Imaging-guided Percutaneous Catheterization Drainage And Laparoscopic Unroofing For Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease

Objective:To assess the clinical value of flexible ureteroscope incision drainage unite Imaging-guided Percutaneous Catheterization Drainage as compared and Laparoscopic unroofing for autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease.Methods:The clinical data(demographic,intraoperative,postoperative and midterm follow-up data)for 26 patients who underwent flexible ureteroscope incision drainage unite Imaging-guided Percutaneous Catheterization Drainage compared with those for 22 patients who underwent Laparoscopic unroofing in Jiangsu Armed Police Corps Hospital.Approach:Student-test,Pearson chi-square test and Mann-Whitey rank sum test were applied for statistical analysis as appropriate.Statistical significance was defined as P<0.05.Results:Patient demographics were similar between the two groups.In group A,operation time,estimated blood loss,recovery of intestinal function,analgesic requirements,postoperative length of hospital stay,intraoperative complications and clinical outcome are better than those in group B(P<0.05).Conclusion:Flexible ureteroscope incision drainage unite Imaging-guided Percutaneous Cath-eterizati-on Drainage is a minimally invasive,safe and effective therapy for auto-somal dominant polycystic kidney disease.