| Objectives To compare the biological characteristics of nucleus pulposus-derived stem cells(NPSCs), annulus fibrosus-derived stem cells(AFSCs) and cartilage endplate-derived stem cells(CESCs) from the same patient who had degenerative disc. Methods The human discs isolated from 7 patients with intervertebral disc herniation were separated carefully and digested and filtered before getting the original NPSCsã€AFSCs and CESCs. When cultivated to third passage, the cell activity of stem cells was analyzed by using cell counting kit-8(CCK-8); multilineage(adipogenic, osteogenic and chondrogenic) differentiation potential was analyzed to define different stem cells. The total RNA of third-passage-cells was extracted, and then the RT- PCR(Real timepolymerase chain reaction) was used to detect the relative expression of adipogenic, osteogenic and chondrogenic differentiation-related genes. Results Cell morphology of NPSCsã€AFSCs and CESCs from the same patient showed no significant difference. The growth curve showed that proliferative ability of CESCs(OD value at day 1ã€3ã€5ã€7ã€9ã€11ã€13ã€15 was 0.35±0.01,0.52±0.02,0.64±0.08,0.80±0.19,0.79±0.2,1.06±0.11,1.37±0.09,1.31±0.41) and AFSCs(0.38±0.01, 0.50±0.03, 0.72±0.06, 0.82±0.13,0.87±0.08,0.87±0.09,1.20±0.05,1.43±0.05)was more active than that of NPSCs(0.32±0.02,0.42±0.04, 0.59±0.01, 0.64±0.17, 0.65±0.19, 0.68±0.21, 0.67±0.12,0.59±0.12). Multilineage differentiation results showed adipocyte-like red by oil red Oã€osteocyte-like cells were stained red by Alizarin red, and chondrocyte-like cells blue by toluidine blue. The RT-PCR results showed that AFSCs was better than NPSCs and CESCs in the aspect of the expression of adipogenic(the relative expression of PPARγ gene was 6.85±0.32 vs 6.63±0.50 and 7.21±0.21; the relative expression of LPL gene was 13.72±0.37 vs 8.41±0.42 and 10.62±0.37)and chondrogenic(the relative expression of COII gene was 10.45±1.10 vs 3.53±0.62 and 8.26±0.49; the relative expression of SOX-9 gene was 14.39±1.22 vs 7.66±0.68 and 13.70±1.10)differentiation-related genes, whereas the expression of osteogenic differentiation-related genes was best in CESCs(the relative expression of RUNX-2 gene was 7.30±1.1 vs2.61±0.06 and 6.20±0.92); the relative expression of COI gene was 8.22±0.84 vs 7.05±0.82 and 4.94±0.90) and the expression of adipogentic differentiation-related genes, particularly LPL(Lipoprotein lipase) gene was worse in NPSCs. Conclusions The cell morphology was similar among NPSCsã€AFSCs and CESCs in vitro, but biological characteristics of those were different. Induced differentiation and RT-PCR results both showed that AFSCs had more advantages than NPSCs and CESCs in the field of intervertebral disc tissue engineering. |