| Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) is a new disease in new discovery of modern medicine. The cause of the disease so far is not clear from the that is associated with mental disorders or viral infection, in recent years. Through the clinical observation and treatment. Thought and psychology. Sleep. Endocrine and movement. neural, hereditary, immunity.personality diffferences and exercise habits and other factors are related, The rhythm of life is the way then eren rapidly under the condition of body function. And can not adapt to the individual can load the performance for a long time as prominent symptoms and extreme fatigue, sleep more,fatigue, cognitive decline, not only ability weakness and some physical symptoms. Patients are due to extremely fatigue. Make its work activities and health severely affected. For a long time is in a state of not work and study.ObjectiveCFS can occur among widely areas newadays. Especially under influence of rapid. Care of CFS not appeared in effect of the Western ideal. Traditional Chinese Medicine treatment fatigue syndrome clinical efficacy than the Western ideal, and has the advantages of non-toxic side effect. Therefore. The research for the most effective therapy for the disease treatment. So that promote the efficacy of the disease. Improve the quality of life of patients. Is meaningful.MethodsUnder the guidance of tutor professor jian-ping Yin, the study is based on "Liver and Kidney maintenance therapies". The patients with CFS were randomly divided into the treatment group treated with skin needing in Back-shu points.cupping therapy, external application of Chinese herbal ointment and the control group treated with traditional acupuncture. The comprehensive efficacy of two methods. The fatigue symptom score (FS-14). The fatigue symptom score and the chronic fatigue syndrome. Were evaluated. And the comparison between the two therapies was carried out.ResultsFatigue symptom score. The physical fatigue. Fatigue gauge (FS-14).Fatigue Scale total score (physical fatigue score+mental fatigue score). by statistical analysis, compared between the two group before and after the treatment. The treatment group and the control group P<0.05 indicates that there were obvious differences. Indicating that two groups have good therapeutic effect. And treatment group was superior to the control group. Mental fatigue:Comparison between the two groups. treatment group and control group (P>0.05). There are no significant differences. Treatment group and control group have the same curative effect.Comprehensive effect evaluation:In the treatment group. Cases were cured 4,=. markedly effective in cases 9. improved in cases 15. Cases ineffective 2. The total efficiency is 93.33%; The control group, cases were cured 1. Cases were markedly effective 7. Improved in cases 14, Cases were ineffective 8. The total efficiency of 73.33%. After statistical analysis. The treatment group and the control group, indicating that there was evident difference between the two groups(P<0.05). Treatment group was superior to the control group. The difference of the index for indicators to evaluate the data and calculate the difference before and after treatment of the two groups by statistical analysis compared treatment groups.Physical fatigue, mental fatigue, fatigue table total score, And fatigue symptoms integral. Treatment group are better than the control group. The effect of the treatment group was better than the control groupConclusion1. The treatment group and the control group,two kinds of therapy in treatment of chronic fatigue syndrome have a certain effect.2. Fatigue symptom score. The total score and comprehensive effect evaluation. The treatment group were better than the control group.3. The treatment of chronic fatigue syndrome by this means of the acupuncture and the regulation of the divine acupuncture. |
PDF Full Text Request