A Study On The Limitation Of Environmental Administrative Responsibility Of Public Officials

Increasing social contradiction under the environmental crisis, forces us to think about this question that government commitment to environmental responsibility. However, the responsibility will eventually implement the individual who are public officer. Faced with the dilemma of government failure is difficult to crack, the traditional administrative accountability system has been hard up in terms of the environmental administrative responsibility of public officials is investigated. Therefore, many scholars have been proposed that we should imitate the lifelong accountability of misjudged case of the judge to establish the Environmental administrative lifelong accountability system of public officer. In practice, some local governments have established the lifelong accountability system of suitable for the local, or for leadership behavior, or for major decisions. However, since the beginning of the birth of lifelong accountability, is facing a kind of concerns that some people think it is overcorrect. For the concern, the author think that the accountability prescription has more possibilities than the vagueness of lifelong in practice. Based on this, this paper will be discussed the pursing prescription problem of environmental administrative responsible of public officer.Firstly, the author through the discussion that is the decision failure, administrative omission and social contradictions in environment crisis, pointed out the reason of social problems cannot be solved effectively is that some social software turned bad. As the most important social software, but also the most powerful social security, the weak of the legal system in dealing with the question of reality, even in turn exacerbated social problems intensified. After the observation and thinking of these social phenomena and problems, the author thinks that concern the pursing prescription of environmental administrative responsible of public officer has more realistic significance.Secondly, the author firstly combing three concepts, it is public officials, environmental administrative responsibility, environmental administrative responsibility participation, in order to ensure the establishment of a more intuitive understanding. The author also pointed out that the prescription system has more practical significance, because it’s basic elements is clear compared with the vagueness and the real resistance of lifelong. In the respect of theoretical support, the author summarized the value theory of prescription reveals its unique reasonable and persuasive for us. Sustainable development, environmental justice and public participation, answered the corresponding nature between aging and environmental law for us. Different theoretical dimensions of administrative science and economics, in a number of sides confirmed the inevitability of its existence.Then, minutely introduces the system defects of the environmental administrative accountability prescription of public officer, pointed out the prescription of administrative law exists several problems, the short during,, the narrow range of matter and so on. In the environmental law, although it stipulates environmental administrative subject should bear certain environmental administrative responsibility, forget to take responsibility for a certain period limit so that it just likes empty talk. Compared with the latency and high risk of environmental problem, the lag of law is very clear. Therefore, the establishment of the pursing prescription system of environmental administrative responsible of public officer is hanging over our head.Finally, the author according to the contents of the three elements of prescription, and combine some characteristics of environmental problems, conceives the basic framework system should include three aspects that are the application of system, the period and the way of undertake responsibility, contrast with the mentioned previously.