Owners Perspective Of Social Protest Activism Studied

Along with the trend of reform and opening-up policy, housing system also begins to conduct reformation, including the welfare allocation into the individual purchase and the department of community into the commercial district. Thus the owner, a new-class immediately appears. Residents’ Committee, Property company and the Owner shared services and management rights of the commercial district."Troika" keep the same pace constitute the urban grassroots self-government management model. However, with the transition system,"labor pains" caused by the reform, which led the owner difficult to avoid the risk of reform; With the legal system is not perfect, which occurred in the event of damage to the owner’s rights; With the mechanism of expression for interest is not smooth tones, which resulting in the landlord activism can not be set whether the zone on the fight. Owners in the depths of social change is in a vulnerable position on the resources. The rights protection for the owner has become the brand of the times.In this article, I take the research framework of the struggle theory, rely on the reform background, Analysis of the institutional transformation of the times background, the weak identity of structural imbalance, the system "vacuum" for lack of protection, as well as the absence of civic culture which co-created rights opportunity structure. As an opportunity to highlight the contradiction between the owners and developers, property companies, selected Hang yuan xiao qu as the research object. According to the time of development, this paper states the process of building the organization to protect the owner’s rights, which are from a single owner of atomization struggle of the initial stage to the problematic stage and the owners’ committee established finally. Then the roles of think-tank protecting the owner’s rights are discussed to research the organizational guarantee for protecting the owner’s rights. In the owner’s rights discourse studies, the author thinks that interpreting discourse not only stay in the level of words, more should be extended to the macro-culture, emotion and symbols to excavate the discourse power in-depth. In addition, after analyzing the mobilization roles of culture, emotion and symbols in the owner’s rights movements, the author thinks that three constructs together "we", forming the same understanding and providing the legal basis between the owner and the owner. On the choice of the technique of rights, the author analyzes the daily struggle, litigation, letters and visits and struggle with the help of media power which roles are studied in in real process of rights protection. Highlighted the demands of media rights is such a new protest strategy rights practices to adapt to the result of the development of the information age. Affirmed the owners practices used in the activism is the importance and the necessity strategy of timely change.In short, the article from "Rights opportunity structure, organization, discourse and tactics" four dimensions summed up the mechanism of the Hang yuan xiao qu property owners’ activism. Through macro background to microscopic processes, from the institutional environment to cultural constraints, from organize and mobilize into concrete action,which structured a full range of realistic picture for Chinese grass-roots social masses to express their demands and safeguard their own interests. Detailed description of the cases, the writer tried to use a small glimpse of a large aspects, analysis the owner’s activism toward of Transition Period, and proposed to maintain the rights of property owners to achieve the political goals which is building cities grassroots harmony, improving the credibility of the government, maintaining social stability.