| At present, our country’s compensation for express service termsand conditions set by the express company unilaterally, and most of theCourier company, citing the postal law of universal postal service oncargo loss, damage compensation, when the compensation disputehappened, only pay for the postage for1-3times, obviously unfair.Although express company provides insurance services, but outside of thefreight to charge a fee, but not to the valuation mode of transportation ofthe goods take more safety, it is just a Courier company a means of risktransfer, and similar to the nature of insurance, there are illegal. So theCourier company on cargo loss, damage compensation rules, exclude themain rights of consumers, restrict its own responsibility, the principle offair, voluntary, also brought negative influence to the orderlydevelopment of the express market, shall be deemed invalid format terms.At the same time, the Courier company on cargo loss, damagecompensation rules, obvious error, the applicable law is not the same asuniversal postal service express delivery business operations, the postallaw, should not apply Courier company as a civil subject, shall begoverned by the regulation of the "contract law", when the Courier loss,damage to the goods occur, according to the strict liability principle andconsistent principles, rights and obligations as well as the actual value of the loss of goods, to determine the liability for compensation, onlyrelatively fair and reasonable, and to better regulate the express industryhealthy development. |