On The Crime Of Gathering Promiscuous

All the fornication sins in1997as a criminal law revised newcharges, from the moment the birth for the maintenance of public moralsresponsibility. For this crime has been also are many disputes, on the onehand, reflects the modern cultural diversity, but on the other hand alsoshows that the crime existence really worth discussing.This article from all the basic concept of fornication SINS to,through the deep discussion on this crime, and to the related question thecognizance of analysis, finally points out that the current article301ofthe criminal law of defects and deficiencies, and then put forwardlegislation proposals.Specifically, this article is divided into the following three parts:The first part, people gathered fornication SINS in the paper. Thisblame should first make clear the research on charges the ins and outs ofthis article from all the SINS of the concept, origin fornication and startlegislation, and also discusses all of the crime of fornication form.The second part, the judicial recognition of the four problems. Thefirst question, talk about all the naked, can form all the fornication SINS,the author should declare that blow, but whether to all the fornicationcondemned to discuss. The second question, in the process ofprostitution or whoring simultaneous whoring the cognizance of thebehavior, and claims that the behavior of the participants shall classify for different determination. The third question, openly involving lewdconduct that, should not be gathered for fornication, and suggest to otherlaws or regulations on administrative penalties for public security such assanctions. The fourth question, no crime victims under the perspective ofall the sin of fornication that, the suggestion to the privacy of all adultsvoluntary fornication SINS shall be in addition to the.The third part, people gathered fornication SINS the defects andlegislation. As to how to perfect the paragraph1of article301of thecriminal law gathered to keep or sin on adulterous, there are the followingthree point:1. Be said;2. Negative said;3. Compromise said. The authoragreed to the third point, our country "criminal law" in paragraph1ofarticle301gathered the fornication SINS, but will this involves thebehavior of illicit close life defined as a criminal offence, and not theother country’s general practice. And based on the situation of our country,the overt behavior of crime of fornication all reasonable basis, and, tosome extent, is a country the penalty power abuse, the criminal law ismoral field invasion. So will the overt should not be gathered tofornication behavior of crime. In addition the charges in the setting valueimbalances, remain to be improved, and not fully embodies the article301the austerity of criminal law. In conclusion, the author disagree thatarticle301abolished, suggest a partially corrected.