The Ability To Reflect On The Impact Assessment And Behavioral Sense Of Justice

Two hypotheses about revenge, pain hypothesis and information cognition hypothesis. Painful hypothesis that peer, the victim suffered injustice, as long as the extent of the offender suffered pain and victims suffering quite targets for reprisal is complete, the victims will be satisfied. Cognitive information hypothesis, the victims suffered injustice, violations of get revenge, if the offender realize why suffer retaliation, revenge goal completed, the victims will be satisfied. Review of previous literature, more research is to support the information cognition hypothesis, but few involved in the support of information cognition hypothesis. This article discusses the information cognition hypothesis more documentary evidence to support the reasons in the text, we believe that cognitive information may imply the other two types of information, acknowledge victim harm the status of self-esteem (in this capacity must) and accept the lessons (ie, will not do the same injustice).In the experiment, to show the ability to try and partner in the game fairly, so that partner allocation of the money derived from, caused by the uneven distribution of the sense of injustice were re-allocated to allow the subjects to take action (retaliation, punishment, or nothing at all do not do). Were divided into given cognitive information group and the group given cognitive information by the partner in Experiment1assessed the ability of subjects to see was to take action after the satisfaction experiment verified, if the negation was the ability to even try to receive cognitive information will not be satisfied. In the second experiment, the partner of their own injustice to reflect on, to see was to take action after the satisfaction, experimental verification was retaliation, if the pilot was informed that the partner did not accept the lesson, even if received cognitive information was not satisfied with.